Contention, argument, and power have always been the tradition in American political talk. The author argues that any country that began in a revolution was bound to have this history. But the language of argument uses particular words with particular, sometimes shifting meanings, and to know what they are and what they meant over time is a critical contribution to political history. It is true that politicians may act as though they are part of no particular ideological tradition, but history shows that, more often that not, they use an understood meaning to enhance their actions.
评分
评分
评分
评分
功用、自然权利、人民、政府、国家、利益,六个概念串联起的美国政治思想史。太过简单抽象。
评分功用、自然权利、人民、政府、国家、利益,六个概念串联起的美国政治思想史。太过简单抽象。
评分功用、自然权利、人民、政府、国家、利益,六个概念串联起的美国政治思想史。太过简单抽象。
评分功用、自然权利、人民、政府、国家、利益,六个概念串联起的美国政治思想史。太过简单抽象。
评分功用、自然权利、人民、政府、国家、利益,六个概念串联起的美国政治思想史。太过简单抽象。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有