In 1801, the first complete mastodon skeleton was excavated in the Hudson River Valley, marking the climax of a century-long debate in America and Europe over the identity of a mysterious creature known as the American Incognitum. Long before the dinosaurs were discovered and the notion of geological time acquired currency, many citizens of the new republic believed this mythical beast to be a ferocious carnivore, capable of crushing deer and elk in its "monstrous grinders." During the American Revolution, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson avidly collected its bones; for the founding fathers, its massive jaws symbolized the violence of the natural world and the emerging nation's own dreams of conquest. Paul Semonin's lively history of this icon of American nationalism focuses on the link between patriotism and prehistoric nature. From the first fist-sized tooth found in 1705, which Puritan clergyman claimed was evidence of human giants, to the scientific racialism associated with the discovery of extinct species, Semonin traces the evangelical beliefs, Enlightenment thought, and Indian myths which led the founding fathers to view this prehistoric monster as a symbol of nationhood. Semonin also sees the mystery of the mastodon in early America as a cautionary tale about the first flowering of our narcissistic fascination with a prehistoric nature ruled by ferocious carnivores. As such, American Monster offers fresh insights into the genesis of the ongoing fascination with dinosaurs.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
The argument and topic are interesting enough, but the book is written in such a unpleasant way: unnecessarily wordy, repetitive, and boring.
评分The argument and topic are interesting enough, but the book is written in such a unpleasant way: unnecessarily wordy, repetitive, and boring.
评分The argument and topic are interesting enough, but the book is written in such a unpleasant way: unnecessarily wordy, repetitive, and boring.
评分The argument and topic are interesting enough, but the book is written in such a unpleasant way: unnecessarily wordy, repetitive, and boring.
评分The argument and topic are interesting enough, but the book is written in such a unpleasant way: unnecessarily wordy, repetitive, and boring.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有