By the time Rock Hudson's death in 1985 alerted all America to the danger of the AIDS epidemic, the disease had spread across the nation, killing thousands of people and emerging as the greatest health crisis of the 20th century. America faced a troubling question: What happened? How was this epidemic allowed to spread so far before it was taken seriously? In answering these questions, Shilts weaves the disparate threads into a coherent story, pinning down every evasion and contradiction at the highest levels of the medical, political, and media establishments.
Shilts shows that the epidemic spread wildly because the federal government put budget ahead of the nation's welfare; health authorities placed political expediency before the public health, and scientists were often more concerned with international prestige than saving lives. Against this backdrop, Shilts tells the heroic stories of individuals in science and politics, public health and the gay community, who struggled to alert the nation to the enormity of the danger it faced. And the Band Played On is both a tribute to these heroic people and a stinging indictment of the institutions that failed the nation so badly.
RANDY SHILTS was one of the first journalists to recognize AIDS as an important national issue and, in the early 1980s, he began to report on AIDS full time for the San Francisco Chronicle, making him the only journalist to do so. He was also the author of The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk and Conduct Unbecoming: Gay and Lesbians in the U.S. Military. Shilts died of AIDS-related complications in early 1994.
这本书的作者兰迪·希尔茨是1980年代初第一批意识到艾滋病问题的美国记者之一。作者以广泛而全面的新闻调查,讲了一个故事: 艾滋病,为什么会在美国流行? 为什么在这场灾难中,时间就是生命? 故事是以时间为脉络呈现给大家的,在阅读过程中,你将知道人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV...
评分「有些人已经说过,罗纳德·里根在历史书上只有一件事被人铭记:他是任由艾滋病在美国蔓延人;是在行动迫在眉睫时,将政治置于美国人民的健康之上的国家元首。」 如果最开始发现的时候就得到重视,得到公众的关注和理解,这可能可以改变一些。然而,疾控中心只把这些未确定的...
评分「有些人已经说过,罗纳德·里根在历史书上只有一件事被人铭记:他是任由艾滋病在美国蔓延人;是在行动迫在眉睫时,将政治置于美国人民的健康之上的国家元首。」 如果最开始发现的时候就得到重视,得到公众的关注和理解,这可能可以改变一些。然而,疾控中心只把这些未确定的...
评分很难说是一种怎样复杂的情感,这本书很多片段在2020年这个肺炎流行的春节假日里有着类似的对照,仿佛相似剧情的又一次上演。我打开朋友圈或者微博都是铺天盖地的信息,或真或假,令我窒息又让大多数人恐慌和愤怒。 回到这本书,我们该谴责的是什么呢?同性恋放荡的...
评分2020-08-04 这是新冠疫情以来,第四本有关病毒之书,杂糅与艾滋病毒有关的同性恋、病毒、症状、新闻、政治、研究、心理等等内容。正如多方原因导致艾滋病大流行,本书没有明显焦点,某种意义上就是政治八卦。这种写法有点像 Jackson Pollock 那些抽象画,密密麻麻笔触,近乎背...
I can't help but think maybe the history is repeating itself. What‘s happened in the US feels so familiar. The Trump administration's response to covid-19 in the early days of the outbreak was almost parallel to that of Reagan's.
评分这本大概是对艾滋的历史最全面深入的解剖了。也只有Randy SHILTS能写出这样的作品—Access和Empathy!如果我是editor,我唯一的建议是600页的内容其实是可以再浓缩的。(有Hiroshima做先例,任何non-fiction都应该有被浓缩在两百页以内依然是masterpiece的自信。)
评分通过本书 将知道人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和获得性免疫综合征(AIDS)是如何在美国发现并扩散的 将看到影响艾滋病的大量事件及各种人物 尤其是政府部门、医疗及研究机构、同性恋组织、媒体中的个体 作者在刻画人类的懦弱、绝望、自私、贪婪的同时 也呈现了人类在面对死亡时的勇气、进取、无私和悲悯 最后以史为鉴打脸提醒:如果一种致命的新疫情蔓延 国家在那一刻没有任何理由推卸责任 而监督政府研究人员和公共卫生部门是否尽职的 本该是最富攻击性的媒体 大众的「看门狗」各中意味 自行体会
评分大概是对美国80年代关于艾滋病发现和科研历史最详尽的一本书了,作者详实的访谈让人感动。难以想象最初为AIDS挣扎的人都经历了什么,在最黑暗的地方也有光,要将火炬传递下去。
评分这个书名太好了