Glynn provides a new reading of Vladimir Nabokov's work by seeking to challenge the notion that he was a Symbolist writer concerned with a transcendent reality. Glynn argues that Nabokov's epistemology was in fact anti-Symbolist and that this aligned him with both Bergsonism and Russian Formalism, which intellectual systems were themselves hostile to a Symbolist epistemology. Symbolism may be seen to devalue material reality by presenting it as a mere adumbration of a higher realm. Nabokov, however, valued the immediate material world and was creatively engaged by the tendency of the deluded mind to efface that reality.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
Bergson and Humberg philosophy. Lolita Project
评分說vn是形式主義者我信 說他完全不是象徵主義者我覺得分析得沒有說服我 分析Lolita 說Humbert是以隱喻的方式看待他人 例證太少 幾乎都是空口白牙在講 但是角度到蠻清奇的 好多評論者都說到Humbert的半盲 但是半盲的原因何在 隻有這個深入瞭一點
评分說vn是形式主義者我信 說他完全不是象徵主義者我覺得分析得沒有說服我 分析Lolita 說Humbert是以隱喻的方式看待他人 例證太少 幾乎都是空口白牙在講 但是角度到蠻清奇的 好多評論者都說到Humbert的半盲 但是半盲的原因何在 隻有這個深入瞭一點
评分Bergson and Humberg philosophy. Lolita Project
评分說vn是形式主義者我信 說他完全不是象徵主義者我覺得分析得沒有說服我 分析Lolita 說Humbert是以隱喻的方式看待他人 例證太少 幾乎都是空口白牙在講 但是角度到蠻清奇的 好多評論者都說到Humbert的半盲 但是半盲的原因何在 隻有這個深入瞭一點
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有