John Ruskin's "Sesame and Lilies", first published in 1865, stands as a classic 19th-century statement on the natures and duties of men and women. Although widely popular in its time, the work in its entirety has been out of print since the early 20th century. This volume reunites the two halves of the work: "Of Kings' Treasuries", in which Ruskin critiques Victorian manhood, and "Of Queens' Gardens", in which he counsels women to take their places as the moral guides of men and urges the parents of girls to educate them to this end. Feminist critics of the 1960s and 1970s regarded "Of Queens' Gardens" as an exemplary expression of repressive Victorian ideas about femininity, and they paired it with John Stuart Mill's more progressive "Subjection of Women". This volume, by including the often ignored "Of Kings' Treasuries", offers readers full access to Ruskin's complex and sometimes contradictory views on men and women. The accompanying essays place "Sesame and Lilies" within historical debates on men, women, culture and the family. Elizabeth Helsinger examines the text as a meditation on the pleasures of reading; Seth Koven gives a wide-ranging account of how Victorians read "Sesame and Lilies"; and Jan Marsh situates the work within controversies over educational reform.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
講座的文稿，sesame部分強調文化，尤其是書籍的作用。Ruskin強調裝幀一定要精美，字一定要夠大，贊同！某些版本，看一頁，感覺視力就會掉一度。lilies部分談女性的教育，今天讀起來有些古舊。
评分正文兩篇演講，主要結閤批判當時社會弊病談論閱讀、教育與性彆認知和分工，個人感覺Ruskin的論述的邏輯和組織都不強，但是語言修辭手法之嫻熟乍聽之下很能服人，醍醐感並不強，觀點本身不難但是很多舉例看到迷糊。書後的Rethinking部分，第一篇引證最深奧討論論點的矛盾和Ruskin運用的小tricks；第二篇我比較喜歡背景知識瞭解；最後一篇談瞭好多八卦似乎暗示Ruskin某些特殊癖好不過關於前後女性覺醒和“女權主義”的影響陳述值得一看。
评分正文兩篇演講，主要結閤批判當時社會弊病談論閱讀、教育與性彆認知和分工，個人感覺Ruskin的論述的邏輯和組織都不強，但是語言修辭手法之嫻熟乍聽之下很能服人，醍醐感並不強，觀點本身不難但是很多舉例看到迷糊。書後的Rethinking部分，第一篇引證最深奧討論論點的矛盾和Ruskin運用的小tricks；第二篇我比較喜歡背景知識瞭解；最後一篇談瞭好多八卦似乎暗示Ruskin某些特殊癖好不過關於前後女性覺醒和“女權主義”的影響陳述值得一看。
评分很久沒看原版，有點吃力
评分很久沒看原版，有點吃力
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有