Andersen-Wyman's book undoes most scholarly uses and understandings of "De amore" by Andreas Capellanus. By offering a reading promoted by the text itself, Andersen-Wyman shows how Andreas undermines the narrative foundations of sacred and secular institutions and renders their power absurd. Her book offers the best explanation yet for why Andreas's was one of only two books condemned by Bishop Tempier in 1276: the tools Andreas offers his readers, as well as what Andreas suggests about his own desire and what should be the place of women in society, could make his book dangerous in almost any era.
评分
评分
评分
评分
切,"double truth"根本就是虚晃一下,完全没介入
评分切,"double truth"根本就是虚晃一下,完全没介入
评分切,"double truth"根本就是虚晃一下,完全没介入
评分切,"double truth"根本就是虚晃一下,完全没介入
评分切,"double truth"根本就是虚晃一下,完全没介入
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有