Introduction to Animal Rights 在线电子书 图书标签: 伦理学
发表于2024-11-28
Introduction to Animal Rights 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2024
Two-thirds of Americans polled by the "Associated Press" agree with the following statement: "An animal's right to live free of suffering should be just as important as a person's right to live free of suffering." More than 50 percent of Americans believe that it is wrong to kill animals to make fur coats or to hunt them for sport. But these same Americans eat hamburgers, take their children to circuses and rodeos, and use products developed with animal testing. How do we justify our inconsistency? In this easy-to-read introduction, animal rights advocate Gary Francione looks at our conventional moral thinking about animals. Using examples, analogies, and thought-experiments, he reveals the dramatic inconsistency between what we say we believe about animals and how we actually treat them. "Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog?" provides a guidebook to examining our social and personal ethical beliefs. It takes us through concepts of property and equal consideration to arrive at the basic contention of animal rights: that everyone - human and non-human - has the right not to be treated as a means to an end. Along the way, it illuminates concepts and theories that all of us use but few of us understand - the nature of "rights" and "interests," for example, and the theories of Locke, Descartes, and Bentham. Filled with fascinating information and cogent arguments, this is a book that you may love or hate, but that will never fail to inform, enlighten, and educate. Author note: Gary L. Francione is Professor of Law and Nicholas de B. Katzenbach Scholar of Law and Philosophy at Rutgers University Law School, Newark. He is the author of "Animals, Property, and the Law" and "Rain Without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement" (both Temple).
植物也是生命,那如果食用动物是不应该的,那对于植物也同样。所以素食主义者都是虚伪的。 a.动物权利主义者主张我们不应该食用动物尸体并非是因为动物是生命(所以我们也不应该食用植物和我们是虚伪的结论也便是荒谬的)。 b.很明显杀一个人和杀十个人在道德上是有很大区别的...
评分植物也是生命,那如果食用动物是不应该的,那对于植物也同样。所以素食主义者都是虚伪的。 a.动物权利主义者主张我们不应该食用动物尸体并非是因为动物是生命(所以我们也不应该食用植物和我们是虚伪的结论也便是荒谬的)。 b.很明显杀一个人和杀十个人在道德上是有很大区别的...
评分植物也是生命,那如果食用动物是不应该的,那对于植物也同样。所以素食主义者都是虚伪的。 a.动物权利主义者主张我们不应该食用动物尸体并非是因为动物是生命(所以我们也不应该食用植物和我们是虚伪的结论也便是荒谬的)。 b.很明显杀一个人和杀十个人在道德上是有很大区别的...
评分植物也是生命,那如果食用动物是不应该的,那对于植物也同样。所以素食主义者都是虚伪的。 a.动物权利主义者主张我们不应该食用动物尸体并非是因为动物是生命(所以我们也不应该食用植物和我们是虚伪的结论也便是荒谬的)。 b.很明显杀一个人和杀十个人在道德上是有很大区别的...
评分植物也是生命,那如果食用动物是不应该的,那对于植物也同样。所以素食主义者都是虚伪的。 a.动物权利主义者主张我们不应该食用动物尸体并非是因为动物是生命(所以我们也不应该食用植物和我们是虚伪的结论也便是荒谬的)。 b.很明显杀一个人和杀十个人在道德上是有很大区别的...
Introduction to Animal Rights 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2024