In recent years the thought of Martin Heidegger has been the target of many attacks, fueled by the fact that he joined the Nazi Party and openly supported Germany's National Socialist regime. A great number of his detractors point to a fundamental irrationalism allegedly lying at the heart of his philosophy, which, it is claimed, encouraged his involvement with National Socialism. Heidegger's rejection of reason and objective, rationally determined standards is believed to imply that practical norms are merely arbitrary conventions without foundation. They are forged either by the arbitrary acts of a radically free human subject ('decisionism', the position of the early Heidegger) or by the equally arbitrary dispensations of the unrestricted power of Being, which is beyond the capability of reason to comprehend ('quietism', the position of the later Heidegger).Both positions, Heidegger's opponents contend, amount to amoral irrationalism.In this rigorously argued and clearly written discussion of these crucial questions regarding Heidegger's thought, philosopher Mark Basil Tanzer argues that Heidegger's questioning of rationality and his rejection of objectivity did not cause him to abandon the idea of norms, or to embrace the arbitrariness of irrationality implied by his critics. Tanzer suggests that Heidegger's critics have fundamentally misunderstood his idea of freedom, the key to which lies in Heidegger's notion of resoluteness. Understood as the individual's realization of freedom or the activity by which Dasein becomes what it properly is, resoluteness is essentially a moral criterion that is indeterminate but violable. Freedom is thus highly constrained through resoluteness. In this way, Heidegger's idea of freedom is quite different from the typical existentialist notion of freedom as unrestricted arbitrariness. This profound yet accessible analysis makes a major contribution to Heidegger studies.
评分
评分
评分
评分
我必须承认,这本书的论述方式相当具有挑战性,它并非是那种可以轻松浏览的读物。作者似乎故意采用了一种高密度的表达方式,每一个句子都承载了大量的哲学重量,要求读者具备相当的背景知识储备。如果对相关哲学史缺乏基本的了解,可能会感到在阅读过程中步履维艰。然而,一旦跟上了作者的思维节奏,那种豁然开朗的感觉是无与伦比的。它不仅仅是在解释理论,更像是在重构一种思考问题的方式。我特别欣赏作者在引入批判性声音时所采取的态度——既不全盘否定,也不盲目附和,而是以一种近乎解剖学家的精准度来分析其合理性与局限性。这种平衡和审慎,使得全书的论点显得尤为坚实和无可辩驳,充满了学术的勇气和深度。
评分从排版和整体的视觉感受来看,这本书透射出一种经典学者的风范,没有过多花哨的设计,内容本身就是最强大的吸引力。但真正让我印象深刻的是作者在构建论证时所展现出的那种近乎音乐般的韵律感。尽管主题严肃,但行文之间偶尔出现的精准类比和结构上的对称美感,让阅读过程不至于枯燥。例如,在探讨某个特定概念的两次出现时,作者会在不同的章节中进行巧妙的呼应和对比,形成一种回旋往复的张力场。这种精心编排的结构,不仅仅是为了美观,更是为了服务于论证的逻辑完整性,让读者在潜意识中感受到思想的闭合与延展。它要求读者不仅要理解“说了什么”,更要关注“如何说的”,这无疑提升了阅读的层次感。
评分这本书的魅力,很大程度上来源于它对“边缘”思想的执着挖掘和重新定位。它不像许多主流的哲学论著那样热衷于追逐热门话题,反而将目光投向那些在经典解读中经常被忽视或误解的部分。作者的笔触在这里显得极其敏锐而富有同情心,试图为这些被边缘化的声音提供一个重新发声的平台。这种重估过程,不仅仅是文本层面的清理工作,更是一种方法论上的革新。读完之后,我发现自己对某些长期以来习以为常的概念产生了根本性的怀疑,这正是优秀哲学著作的价值所在——它能有效地震动你既有的认知结构。阅读体验是充满张力的,因为作者不断地在“接受”和“超越”之间进行微妙的平衡,使得读者始终处于一种既熟悉又陌生的思想疆域中。
评分这本书的叙事节奏,坦率地说,并不适合心浮气躁的读者。它更像是对一种长期沉淀下来的思想气质的慢炖。作者似乎并不急于抛出惊世骇俗的结论,而是更倾向于铺陈背景、引入对立面,然后才小心翼翼地搭建起自己的论证桥梁。这种铺陈的手法,虽然在初期可能会让人感到有些缓慢,但一旦深入其中,便能体会到其用意——这是一种对理解深度的要求。我注意到,作者在处理复杂的历史语境时,展现出了极强的历史敏感性,将所探讨的概念放置在特定的时代脉络中进行考察,避免了生硬的现代解读。这种深沉的、近乎内省式的写作风格,使得整本书读起来有一种厚重感,仿佛在与一位极其博学的导师进行一场冗长但极具价值的对话。它迫使你放慢脚步,去品味那些看似寻常的措辞背后隐藏的复杂张力。
评分这本书的结构和行文方式给我一种非常扎实和严谨的学术探究感。作者显然花费了大量精力来梳理和辩证不同的哲学立场,尤其是那些看似矛盾的观点之间的潜在联系。阅读过程中,我时常被那种层层递进的论证所吸引,它不像是一本简单的观点陈述,而更像是一场精心设计的思想交锋。书中的每一个概念似乎都经过了反复的打磨和锤炼,确保其在整个哲学框架内的准确性和解释力。尤其是在处理一些晦涩难懂的文本时,作者展现出了非凡的耐心和洞察力,能够穿透语言的迷雾,直达思想的核心。这种对文本细致入微的解读,使得即便是对该领域有一定了解的读者,也能从中获得新的启发和认识。它要求读者保持高度的专注,但所带来的智力回报也是丰厚的,让人忍不住想要一次性读完,生怕遗漏了任何一个关键的转折点。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有