Does democracy decrease state repression in line with the expectations of governments, international organizations, NGOs, social movements, academics and ordinary citizens around the world? Most believe that a 'domestic democratic peace' exists, rivalling that found in the realm of interstate conflict. Investigating 137 countries from 1976 to 1996, this book seeks to shed light on this question. Specifically, three results emerge. First, while different aspects of democracy decrease repressive behaviour, not all do so to the same degree. Human rights violations are especially responsive to electoral participation and competition. Second, while different types of repression are reduced, not all are limited at comparable levels. Personal integrity violations are decreased more than civil liberties restrictions. Third, the domestic democratic peace is not bulletproof; the negative influence of democracy on repression can be overwhelmed by political conflict. This research alters our conception of repression, its analysis and its resolution.
评分
评分
评分
评分
repression研究狂魔-Davenport. 量化加一丢丢历史比较分析,传统观点认为民主对镇压有缓解作用,作者通过dissaggregation and contextualization展现了如何从已有结论中挖掘可研究的题目,民主减轻镇压,但民主的哪方面对镇压缓解作用更强的,对不同镇压行为影响一样么?面对政治冲突时以上的效应还存在么。通过细化democray(voice and veto), repression(restictions, violence/ repressive lethality),political conflict(violent dissent, civlic war)等变量来挑战笼统的民主化解压制的说法。少有的能没让我跳过分析部分的定量作品。清晰易懂
评分repression研究狂魔-Davenport. 量化加一丢丢历史比较分析,传统观点认为民主对镇压有缓解作用,作者通过dissaggregation and contextualization展现了如何从已有结论中挖掘可研究的题目,民主减轻镇压,但民主的哪方面对镇压缓解作用更强的,对不同镇压行为影响一样么?面对政治冲突时以上的效应还存在么。通过细化democray(voice and veto), repression(restictions, violence/ repressive lethality),political conflict(violent dissent, civlic war)等变量来挑战笼统的民主化解压制的说法。少有的能没让我跳过分析部分的定量作品。清晰易懂
评分repression研究狂魔-Davenport. 量化加一丢丢历史比较分析,传统观点认为民主对镇压有缓解作用,作者通过dissaggregation and contextualization展现了如何从已有结论中挖掘可研究的题目,民主减轻镇压,但民主的哪方面对镇压缓解作用更强的,对不同镇压行为影响一样么?面对政治冲突时以上的效应还存在么。通过细化democray(voice and veto), repression(restictions, violence/ repressive lethality),political conflict(violent dissent, civlic war)等变量来挑战笼统的民主化解压制的说法。少有的能没让我跳过分析部分的定量作品。清晰易懂
评分repression研究狂魔-Davenport. 量化加一丢丢历史比较分析,传统观点认为民主对镇压有缓解作用,作者通过dissaggregation and contextualization展现了如何从已有结论中挖掘可研究的题目,民主减轻镇压,但民主的哪方面对镇压缓解作用更强的,对不同镇压行为影响一样么?面对政治冲突时以上的效应还存在么。通过细化democray(voice and veto), repression(restictions, violence/ repressive lethality),political conflict(violent dissent, civlic war)等变量来挑战笼统的民主化解压制的说法。少有的能没让我跳过分析部分的定量作品。清晰易懂
评分repression研究狂魔-Davenport. 量化加一丢丢历史比较分析,传统观点认为民主对镇压有缓解作用,作者通过dissaggregation and contextualization展现了如何从已有结论中挖掘可研究的题目,民主减轻镇压,但民主的哪方面对镇压缓解作用更强的,对不同镇压行为影响一样么?面对政治冲突时以上的效应还存在么。通过细化democray(voice and veto), repression(restictions, violence/ repressive lethality),political conflict(violent dissent, civlic war)等变量来挑战笼统的民主化解压制的说法。少有的能没让我跳过分析部分的定量作品。清晰易懂
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有