具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
strip causality from form, boundary belongs to the phenomenon and not to the formal surface, the once privileged surface becomes incidental, move towards architecture of "the campfire". Banham之后讲了这么多年, 真正做到building scale可能只有transsolar? 为什么大家对这个不感兴趣呢? how is this not architecture????
评分strip causality from form, boundary belongs to the phenomenon and not to the formal surface, the once privileged surface becomes incidental, move towards architecture of "the campfire". Banham之后讲了这么多年, 真正做到building scale可能只有transsolar? 为什么大家对这个不感兴趣呢? how is this not architecture????
评分strip causality from form, boundary belongs to the phenomenon and not to the formal surface, the once privileged surface becomes incidental, move towards architecture of "the campfire". Banham之后讲了这么多年, 真正做到building scale可能只有transsolar? 为什么大家对这个不感兴趣呢? how is this not architecture????
评分strip causality from form, boundary belongs to the phenomenon and not to the formal surface, the once privileged surface becomes incidental, move towards architecture of "the campfire". Banham之后讲了这么多年, 真正做到building scale可能只有transsolar? 为什么大家对这个不感兴趣呢? how is this not architecture????
评分strip causality from form, boundary belongs to the phenomenon and not to the formal surface, the once privileged surface becomes incidental, move towards architecture of "the campfire". Banham之后讲了这么多年, 真正做到building scale可能只有transsolar? 为什么大家对这个不感兴趣呢? how is this not architecture????
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有