Alberto Giacometti’s 1934 Cube stands apart for many as atypical of the Swiss artist, the only abstract sculptural work in a wide oeuvre that otherwise had as its objective the exploration of reality.
With The Cube and the Face, renowned French art historian and philosopher Georges Didi-Huberman has conducted a careful analysis of Cube, consulting the artist’s sketches, etchings, texts, and other sculptural works in the years just before and after Cube was created. Cube, he finds, is indeed exceptional—a work without clear stylistic kinship to the works that came before or after it. At the same time, Didi-Huberman shows, Cube marks the transition between the artist’s surrealist and realist phases and contains many elements of Giacometti’s aesthetic consciousness, including his interest in dimensionality, the relation of the body to geometry, and the portrait—or what Didi-Huberman terms “abstract anthropomorphism.” Drawing on Freud, Bataille, Leiris, and others Giacometti counted as influence, Didi-Huberman presents fans and collectors of Giacometti’s art with a new approach to transitional work.
评分
评分
评分
评分
感谢迪迪-于贝尔曼,让我想写的关于Giacometti和Durer的小文章彻底猝死。想求求于贝尔曼认真学习Panofsky,把瓦煲的方法论贯彻一下,不要再用现象学那套了。
评分感谢迪迪-于贝尔曼,让我想写的关于Giacometti和Durer的小文章彻底猝死。想求求于贝尔曼认真学习Panofsky,把瓦煲的方法论贯彻一下,不要再用现象学那套了。
评分感谢迪迪-于贝尔曼,让我想写的关于Giacometti和Durer的小文章彻底猝死。想求求于贝尔曼认真学习Panofsky,把瓦煲的方法论贯彻一下,不要再用现象学那套了。
评分感谢迪迪-于贝尔曼,让我想写的关于Giacometti和Durer的小文章彻底猝死。想求求于贝尔曼认真学习Panofsky,把瓦煲的方法论贯彻一下,不要再用现象学那套了。
评分感谢迪迪-于贝尔曼,让我想写的关于Giacometti和Durer的小文章彻底猝死。想求求于贝尔曼认真学习Panofsky,把瓦煲的方法论贯彻一下,不要再用现象学那套了。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有