Social Media in Rural China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Tom McDonald is Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology, The University of Hong Kong. He received his PhD in Anthropology from UCL in 2013 and has published numerous academic articles on Internet use and consumption practices in China.

出版者:UCL Press

作者:Tom McDonald

出品人:

页数:220

译者:

出版时间:2016-9

价格:GBP 15.00

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9781910634684

丛书系列:

图书标签:

人类学
传播学
农村
anthropology
Communication
网络社会学
网络
社会学

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到图书目录大全

book.wenda123.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

China’s distinctive social media platforms have gained notable popularity among the nation’s vast number of internet users, but has China’s countryside been ‘left behind’ in this communication revolution?

Tom McDonald spent 15 months living in a small rural Chinese community researching how the residents use social media in their daily lives. His ethnographic findings suggest that, far from being left behind, social media is already deeply integrated into the everyday experience of many rural Chinese people.

Throughout his ground-breaking study, McDonald argues that social media allows rural people to extend and transform their social relationships by deepening already existing connections with friends known through their school, work or village, while also experimenting with completely new forms of relationships through online interactions with strangers. By juxtaposing these seemingly opposed relations, rural social media users are able to use these technologies to understand, capitalise on and challenge the notions of morality that underlie rural life.

具体描述

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

任何生活在中国的人都不需要看它对你的日常生活的浮光掠影的总结，它把连常识都算不上的东西作为研究发现。我疯了，真的！

评分☆☆☆☆☆

1）一個外國人一本正經地描述QQ空間和QQ等級，總有一種非常違和的喜感，；2）將social media帶入，來挑戰費孝通和楊美惠等人所建構的傳統中國親屬關係和人際關係，以及將「賭博性」帶入QQ遊戲的討論，切入的視角其實很有趣，但前者的討論事實上沒有做好，後者的討論有些牽強和「一本道」了；3）小錯誤很多，頁75，「生命誠可貴，愛情價更高」是裴多菲的詩，不是Chinese saying；頁143，「一家仁，一國興仁……」並不是《論語》裡的，應該是《大學》裡的；頁145及其後，「金盾工程」并不等於方濱興弄的「防火長城」，儘管作者很狡黠地用了colloquially一詞；4）作者田野調查是2013年，這是一個很尷尬的時段，而到了本書出版的2016，裡面的很多論斷已經是可以商榷了。。。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

第一章一边笑一边看的呢。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

还行吧。直球。选题也挺有意思的。可是有些结论很让人费解。比如孩子希望与父母在网络世界建立联系。当然作者的田野结果就是这么说的。还有性别关怀有点硬拗。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

第一章一边笑一边看的呢。