"Don't start an art collective until you read this book." --Guerrilla Girls "Ever since Web 2.0 with its wikis, blogs and social networks the art of collaboration is back on the agenda. "Collectivism after Modernism" convincingly proves that art collectives did not stop after the proclaimed death of the historical avant-gardes. Like never before technology reinvents the social and artists claim the steering wheel " --Geert Lovink, Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam "This examination of the succession of post-war avant-gardes and collectives is new, important, and engaged." -- Stephen F. Eisenman, author of" The Abu Ghraib Effect" ""Collectivism after Modernism" crucially helps us understand what artists and others can do in mushy, stinky times like ours. What can the seemingly powerless do in the face of mighty forces that seem to have their act really together? Here, Stimson and Sholette put forth many good answers." --Yes Men Spanning the globe from Europe, Japan, and the United States to Africa, Cuba, and Mexico, "Collectivism after Modernism" explores the ways in which collectives function within cultural norms, social conventions, and corporate or state-sanctioned art. Together, these essays demonstrate that collectivism survives as an influential artistic practice despite the art world's star system of individuality. "Collectivism after Modernism" provides the historical understanding necessary for thinking through postmodern collective practice, now and into the future. Contributors: Irina Aristarkhova, Jesse Drew, Okwui Enwezor, Ruben Gallo, Chris Gilbert, Brian Holmes, Alan Moore, Jelena Stojanovic, Reiko Tomii, Rachel Weiss. Blake Stimson is associate professor of art history at the University of California Davis, the author of "The Pivot of the World: Photography and Its Nation, " and coeditor of "Visual Worlds and Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology. "Gregory Sholette is an artist, writer, and cofounder of collectives Political Art Documentation/Distribution and REPOhistory. He is coeditor of "The Interventionists: Users' Manual for the Creative Disruption of Everyday Life."" ""To understand the various forms of postwar collectivism as historically determined phenomena and to articulate the possibilities for contemporary collectivist art production is the aim of Collectivism after Modernism." The essays assembled in this anthology argue that to make truly collective art means to reconsider the relation between art and public; examples from the Situationist International and Group Material to Paper Tiger Television and the Congolese collective Le Groupe Amos make the point. To construct an art of shared experience means to go beyond projecting what Blake Stimson and Gregory Sholette call the "imagined community" a collective has to be more than an ideal, and more than communal craft; it has to be a truly social enterprise. Not only does it use unconventional forms and media to communicate the issues and experiences usually excluded from artistic representation, but it gives voice to a multiplicity of perspectives. At its best it relies on the participation of the audience to actively contribute to the work, carrying forth the dialogue it inspires." --BOMB"
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的文字风格给我留下了极其深刻的印象,它有一种冷峻而优雅的理性美感。作者的行文清晰、逻辑严密,几乎没有多余的修饰,仿佛在进行一场精密的工程分析,但其背后蕴含的对人类社会命运的关怀又显得非常真挚。我尤其喜欢作者在构建论点时所采用的那种层层递进、自我校准的辩证方式,它避免了教条主义,始终保持着一种开放的、探究性的姿态。这种写作风格使得原本可能晦涩难懂的理论变得触手可及,尽管信息量很大,阅读过程却不至于感到枯燥乏味。这就像是跟随一位技艺高超的向导穿越一片复杂的知识迷宫,他不仅指明方向,还细致地解释了每一条路径的选择依据。
评分我个人最被这本书吸引的地方,在于它对情感和社会连结的重新审视。在充斥着犬儒主义和个人主义至上的时代,探讨“我们如何仍然是‘我们’”本身就是一种大胆的姿态。《现代主义之后的集体主义》没有提供廉价的安慰剂,而是直面了集体经验的碎片化和脆弱性。作者对集体记忆如何在后真相时代被重塑和争夺的分析,尤其令人不安又发人深省。它迫使我反思自己日常生活中那些看似自发、实则被精心设计的集体参与感是从何而来。书中引用的那些不太为人所知的社会心理学实验和案例研究,为抽象的哲学讨论提供了坚实的经验基础。总而言之,它成功地捕捉到了当代人那种渴望归属感却又对任何形式的宏大叙事抱有警惕的矛盾心态。
评分如果从一个关注社会实践的行动者的角度来看,这本书的价值在于它提供了一套重新理解“组织”和“动员”的全新词汇表。在现代性叙事崩溃后,旧有的组织模式难以为继,而作者探讨的“涌现式集体主义”为我们思考未来社会运动和社区建设提供了新的框架。它超越了对“效率”的迷恋,转而关注“关系”的质量和“共识”的动态维持。我发现自己常常停下来,将书中的某些观点对照现实中的政治事件或社区冲突进行检验,并且发现这些理论工具相当有效。它不是一本提供现成解决方案的指南,而是一张详尽的、关于当代集体动力学的地图,它揭示了新的地形,引导我们去发现那些尚未被充分开发的社会潜能。对于任何严肃思考社会变革路径的人来说,这都是一本不可或缺的参考书。
评分这本《现代主义之后的集体主义》读起来真是一次思想上的探险,尤其是在处理当代社会复杂性时,作者展现出的细腻洞察力令人印象深刻。首先,我必须指出它在方法论上的大胆尝试。作者并没有固守传统的社会学框架,而是巧妙地编织了历史分析、哲学思辨与对当下文化现象的细致观察。书中关于“后现代解构”如何转化为一种新型的、更具韧性的集体认同构建过程的论述,给我带来了极大的启发。我特别欣赏作者对技术中介的社会交往模式的剖析,那种对数字空间中“虚拟共同体”的权力结构和情感联结机制的深入挖掘,避免了将技术简单地视为工具或威胁,而是将其视为重塑集体经验的内在驱动力。读完第一部分,我感觉自己对过去几十年间社会形态的剧烈变迁有了一种更为立体的理解,这绝非易事,因为许多学者往往陷于对单一变量的过度简化。
评分坦率地说,这本书的叙事节奏和理论密度是相当高的,需要读者投入相当的专注力去消化。我花了很长时间才完全跟上作者在概念转换时的微妙之处,特别是他对“集体性”(Collectivity)这个词汇在不同历史语境下的精确界定和挪用。如果说有什么地方让人感到一丝挑战,那或许是作者在后期章节中对全球化语境下地方性抵抗运动的论述时,其论证的跳跃性略显突然。尽管核心观点——即现代性的瓦解并未导致原子化的终结,而是催生了一种去中心化、多模态的集体形式——是极具说服力的,但在从宏大理论转向具体案例时,个别案例的代表性似乎略显不足,让人渴望更多来自非西方视角的丰富例证来支撑其普适性的主张。然而,这种略带学术挑战性的复杂性,恰恰是它区别于一般普及读物的标志。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有