For more than forty years, Jack Germond has been covering politics for Gannett newspapers, the Washington Star , and the Baltimore Sun, and talking politics on the Today show, The McLaughlin Group, and Inside Washington . Now, in Fat Man Fed Up , Germond confronts the most critical issues raised by our election process and offers a scathing but wry polemic about what’s wrong with American politics.
Is there any connection between what happens in campaigns and what happens in government? And if not, where does the blame for the discontent lie? Was Tocqueville right? Do we get the leaders we deserve? Indeed, according to Germond, the politicians aren’t the only ones to blame, or even the chief culprits. He describes how he and his colleagues in the news media have been guilty of dumbing-down the political process–and how the voters are too apathetic to demand better coverage and better results. Instead, they simply turn away and too often end up enduring third-rate presidents.
This no-sacred-cows manifesto faces the problems many are reluctant to address:
• Polls and how they are used and abused by politicians and press to mislead gullible voters.
• The critical failure of the press to accurately portray figures in the political realm, from Eugene McCarthy to Barbara Bush to Al Sharpton.
• How the complaints about liberal bias in the press miss the real point: whether that bias, if it exists, colors the way editors and reporters work.
• The staggering influence of television, and the networks’ inability to provide anything but the most simplistic coverage of politics.
• The “big lie” school of campaigning. From “Where’s the beef?” to “compassionate conservatism,” the politics of empty slogans has always placed noise above nuance: Say anything loudly enough and long enough, and voters are bound to mistake it for the truth.
Along the way, Germond illustrates his arguments by drawing from his war chest of priceless anecdotes from decades in the business. With his inimitable combination of incisive journalism and sardonic and witty straight talk, Germond guides us through the fog created by candidates and the media. In this timely, outrageous, and compulsively readable book, no one is let off the hook. Fat Man Fed Up is a bracing look at how we never seem to get the truth about the people we’re electing.
From the Hardcover edition.
这本书给我最深刻的印象是其大胆的结构实验和近乎残酷的现实主义剖析。作者似乎完全不顾及读者的阅读舒适度,故意设置了大量的叙事跳跃和时间错位,初读时会感到非常吃力,甚至需要不断回顾前面的章节来重建逻辑线。但正是这种挑战性,带来了非同一般的阅读体验。它探讨的主题相当尖锐,直指社会结构深层的不公与人性的阴暗面,毫不留情地揭示了权力对个体的异化过程。书中对于权力运行机制的描绘,精准得令人心寒,仿佛直接掀开了华丽外衣下的腐朽。我欣赏这种‘不讨好’的写作态度,它要求读者付出相应的努力去理解,而不是被动接受。此外,作者的语言风格冷峻而精确,没有冗余的形容词,每一个词语都像是经过精密计算的,服务于表达那种冰冷、疏离的氛围。读完之后,你会感到一种被‘清洗’过的清醒,尽管过程并不愉快。
评分这本小说,坦白讲,它的魅力在于它所散发出的那种浓郁的地域气息和文化底蕴。作者仿佛是一位技艺高超的陶艺家,用最朴实的泥土,塑造出了一个充满生命力的独特社群。无论是当地人的口音、习俗,还是他们特有的生存哲学,都被描摹得栩栩如生,让人仿佛能闻到空气中的泥土芬芳和海风的咸味。情节的推进虽然没有太多戏剧性的反转,但却充满了生活本身的质感和必然性。角色之间的情感纠葛,不是轰轰烈烈的爱恨情仇,而是那种渗透在日常柴米油盐中的、润物细无声的羁绊与疏离。我特别喜欢其中关于家庭传承的描写,那种代际间无声的责任传递,充满了温暖和淡淡的忧伤。这本书提供了一种难得的‘在场感’,让我们得以窥见一种完全不同的生活方式,并从中获得对‘家’和‘根’的重新理解。
评分我必须要指出,这本书的视角切换处理得极为精妙,它成功地在宏大叙事和个体微观感受之间找到了一个完美的平衡点。故事的主线看似是关于一个时代的变迁,但作者却始终聚焦于几个小人物的命运起伏,通过他们的眼睛,折射出历史洪流的巨大冲击力。高潮部分的安排尤其令人印象深刻,它没有采用传统的英雄主义叙事,而是将胜利或失败的定义模糊化,让读者去思索在巨大的历史背景下,个体意义的价值何在。作者的文笔极具画面感,一些场景的描绘,比如一场突如其来的暴雨,或者一次黄昏的对话,其意境之美堪比经典油画,让人忍不住反复阅读品味其中的光影变化。总而言之,这不是一本轻松的读物,它需要你全神贯注,但一旦你沉浸其中,它所给予你的精神回馈是极其丰厚的,它让你重新审视“我们是如何走到今天这一步的”这个深刻命题。
评分这个故事读完让人心里五味杂陈,主人公的挣扎与抉择,那种身不由己的沉重感,仿佛能穿透纸面直抵人心。作者的笔触极其细腻,对人物内心世界的刻画入木三分,每一个微小的动作、眼神的闪躲,都蕴含着丰富的信息量。我特别欣赏作者处理冲突的方式,不是那种简单粗暴的对立,而是将人性的复杂性展现得淋漓尽致。很多时候,你明明知道角色的选择是错的,却又无法苛责,因为你能理解他走到那一步的全部心路历程。那种深入骨髓的无力感和对命运的反抗,构筑了一个极具张力的叙事空间。书中对环境氛围的渲染也十分到位,阴郁的色调和压抑的场景设置,让读者情不自禁地被拖入那个世界,与角色一同经历煎熬与探寻。这本书不提供简单的答案,它更像一面镜子,映照出我们每个人在面对困境时,可能隐藏在心底深处的真实反应和脆弱。读完合上书本,那种久久不能散去的思考,才是它真正的价值所在。
评分说实话,这本书的叙事节奏有点出乎我的意料,开头部分铺陈得极其缓慢,几乎是用一种近乎散文诗的笔法在描摹一个日常的场景,让人一度怀疑自己是否拿错了书。但请相信我,这种慢热恰恰是作者高明之处。一旦进入到情节的核心驱动力阶段,那种积蓄已久的力量便如洪水决堤般爆发出来,让人措手不及。它构建的世界观非常扎实,细节考究,显示出作者在前期做了大量的功课。我尤其喜欢其中关于记忆与遗忘的主题探讨,作者通过一系列看似不相关的碎片化事件,巧妙地编织出一条关于“真实”的线索,引导读者去质疑我们所接受的既定事实。几位配角的塑造也极其成功,他们并非工具人,而是拥有自己完整逻辑和生命力的个体,他们的介入,极大地丰富了故事的维度和层次感,让整个故事的张力保持在一个很高的水准。对于喜欢深度解析和慢品文本的读者来说,这绝对是一部值得反复咀嚼的作品。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分