This study began in opposition to the predominance of notions of wording in the study of human culture and society. The analyses begin from the influential figures in the qualitative relationships between epistemology, aesthetics and society (such as Plato, Michelangelo, Kant, David, Durkheim, Manet and Lyotard) rather than the more usual quantitative applications of complexity/chaos theory whose influential figures are often mathematicians. The authors argue that much writing that currently passes for, to use a catch-all, postmodern "critical theory" (that claims heterogeneity and plurality as its truth) is both uncritical and homogeneous rather than heterogeneous. As such it represses both difference and our understanding of the social processes of differentiation.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有