Sarah Green, who is a professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Manchester, is a specialist on location, borders and spatial relations. She has been exploring these themes, both in their literal and metaphorical meanings, since her doctoral research at the University of Cambridge, though the subject matter of her research over the last 20 years has been diverse. That has included: the politics of gender and sexuality in London; the engagement with Information and Communications Technologies in Manchester; shifting conceptions of environment and land degradation in the Argolid Valley and northwestern Greece; concepts of border relations on the Greek-Albanian border; the circulation of money in the Aegean; the concept of trust amongst new financial elites in the UK, part of her work as a co-ordinator within the ESRC Centre for Research in Socio-Cultural Change; and, most recently, the shifting concept of border in the eastern peripheries of Europe.

Maps and borders notwithstanding, some places are best described as "gaps" - places with repeatedly contested boundaries that are wedged in between other places that have clear boundaries. This book explores an iconic example of this in the contemporary Western imagination: the Balkans. Drawing on richly detailed ethnographic research around the Greek-Albanian border, Sarah Green focuses her groundbreaking analysis on the ambiguities of never quite resolving where or what places are. One consequence for some Greek peoples in this border area is a seeming lack of distinction - but in a distinctly "Balkan" way. In gaps (which are never empty), marginality is, in contrast with conventional understandings, not a matter of difference and separation - it is a lack thereof."Notes from the Balkans" represents the first ethnographic approach to exploring "the Balkans" as an ideological concept. Green argues that, rather than representing a tension between "West" and "East," the Balkans makes such oppositions ambiguous. This kind of marginality means that such places and peoples can hardly engage with "multiculturalism." Moreover, the region's ambiguity threatens clear, modernist distinctions. The violence so closely associated with the region can therefore be seen as part of continual attempts to resolve the ambiguities by imposing fixed separations. And, every time this fails, the region is once again defined as a place that will continually proliferate such dangerous ambiguity, and could spread it somewhere else.