In this timely book, Cass R. Sunstein shows that organizations and nations are far more likely to prosper if they welcome dissent and promote openness. Attacking "political correctness" in all forms, Sunstein demonstrates that corporations, legislatures, even presidents are likely to blunder if they do not cultivate a culture of candor and disclosure. He shows that unjustified extremism, including violence and terrorism, often results from failure to tolerate dissenting views. The tragedy is that blunders and cruelties could be avoided if people spoke out.
Sunstein casts new light on freedom of speech, showing that a free society not only forbids censorship but also provides public spaces for dissenters to expose widely held myths and pervasive injustices. He provides evidence about the effects of conformity and dissent on the federal courts. The evidence shows not only that Republican appointees vote differently from Democratic appointees but also that both Republican and Democratic judges are likely to go to extremes if unchecked by opposing views. Understanding the need for dissent illuminates countless social debates, including those over affirmative action in higher education, because diversity is indispensable to learning.
Dissenters are often portrayed as selfish and disloyal, but Sunstein shows that those who reject pressures imposed by others perform valuable social functions, often at their own expense. This is true for dissenters in boardrooms, churches, unions, and academia. It is true for dissenters in the White House, Congress, and the Supreme Court. And it is true during times of war and peace.
Cass R. Sunstein graduated in 1975 from Harvard College and in 1978 from Harvard Law School magna cum laude. After graduation, he clerked for Justice Benjamin Kaplan of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and Justice Thurgood Marshall of the U.S. Supreme Court. Before joining the faculty of the University of Chicago Law School, he worked as an attorney-advisor in the Office of the Legal Counsel of the U.S. Department of Justice. Mr. Sunstein has testified before congressional committees on many subjects, and he has been involved in constitution-making and law reform activities in a number of nations, including Ukraine, Poland, China, South Africa, and Russia. A member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Mr. Sunstein has been Samuel Rubin Visiting Professor of Law at Columbia, visiting professor of law at Harvard, vice-chair of the ABA Committee on Separation of Powers and Governmental Organizations, chair of the Administrative Law Section of the Association of American Law Schools, a member of the ABA Committee on the future of the FTC, and a member of the President's Advisory Committee on the Public Service Obligations of Digital Television Broadcasters.
Mr. Sunstein is a member of the Department of Political Science as well as the Law School. He is author of many articles and a number of books, including After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State (1990), Constitutional Law (co-authored with Geoffrey Stone, Louis M. Seidman, and Mark Tushnet) (1995), The Partial Constitution (1993), Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech (1993), Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (1996), Free Markets and Social Justice (1997), Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy (1998) (with Justice Stephen Breyer and Professor Richard Stewart and Matthew Spitzer), One Case At A Time (1999), Behavioral Law and Economics (editor, 2000), Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do (2001), Republic.com (2001), Risk and Reason (2002), The Cost-Benefit State (2002), Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide (2002), Why Societies Need Dissent (2003), The Second Bill of Rights (2004), and Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (2005). He is now working on various projects involving the relationship between law and human behavior.
Born: 1954.
Education: A.B., 1975, J.D., 1978, Harvard University
还没看完,但是看得很吃力,因为翻译得有点烂,估计翻译者整个把原文的句式翻下来而已,都没有做出按照中文句式的调整,里面的逻辑顺序混乱、从句关系不用正常的汉语句式,代词指代不明,看得人脑袋都要炸了,我决定去找原文看,话说这种书难道没有专业人员审稿或试读的吗?我...
评分还没看完,但是看得很吃力,因为翻译得有点烂,估计翻译者整个把原文的句式翻下来而已,都没有做出按照中文句式的调整,里面的逻辑顺序混乱、从句关系不用正常的汉语句式,代词指代不明,看得人脑袋都要炸了,我决定去找原文看,话说这种书难道没有专业人员审稿或试读的吗?我...
评分还没看完,但是看得很吃力,因为翻译得有点烂,估计翻译者整个把原文的句式翻下来而已,都没有做出按照中文句式的调整,里面的逻辑顺序混乱、从句关系不用正常的汉语句式,代词指代不明,看得人脑袋都要炸了,我决定去找原文看,话说这种书难道没有专业人员审稿或试读的吗?我...
评分还没看完,但是看得很吃力,因为翻译得有点烂,估计翻译者整个把原文的句式翻下来而已,都没有做出按照中文句式的调整,里面的逻辑顺序混乱、从句关系不用正常的汉语句式,代词指代不明,看得人脑袋都要炸了,我决定去找原文看,话说这种书难道没有专业人员审稿或试读的吗?我...
评分还没看完,但是看得很吃力,因为翻译得有点烂,估计翻译者整个把原文的句式翻下来而已,都没有做出按照中文句式的调整,里面的逻辑顺序混乱、从句关系不用正常的汉语句式,代词指代不明,看得人脑袋都要炸了,我决定去找原文看,话说这种书难道没有专业人员审稿或试读的吗?我...
这本书的文字风格非常独特,夹杂着一种古典的思辨色彩,读起来仿佛在跟随一位经验丰富的哲人漫步于复杂的思想迷宫之中。他对社会结构和权力运作的剖析,不像那些流行的社科读物那样追求速度和表面的可读性,而是更注重概念的精确性和逻辑链条的完整性。我尤其喜欢他构建理论模型的方式,那种层层递进、互相印证的严密结构,让人在理解过程中既感到挑战,又充满了被引领的快感。例如,他在论述信息流通的“熵增”与社会活力之间的关系时,所采用的类比和数学化的表达,虽然初看有些晦涩,但一旦领悟其核心逻辑,便会豁然开朗。这本书无疑需要读者投入相当的精力去消化,它不是那种可以消遣时翻阅的轻松读物,更像是一部需要反复研读、时常停下来反思的学术经典。对于那些厌倦了浮光掠影式社会评论的人来说,这本书提供了一种久违的、扎实的智力盛宴。
评分这本书最让我感到振奋的是它对“建设性冲突”的积极肯定。在充斥着“和谐至上”论调的当代语境下,作者毫不避讳地指出,健康的社会需要定期的、有组织的“思想交锋”来维持其活力和适应性。他似乎在倡导一种“反脆弱性”的社会模型,即通过暴露于适度的压力和反对意见之下,使社会系统变得更具韧性,而非试图通过压制所有风险来追求虚假的稳定。这种观点在处理公共政策和组织管理时具有极强的实践指导意义。我注意到作者在阐述这一观点时,大量引用了生态学和复杂系统科学中的理论,这种跨学科的借鉴使得他的论述更具说服力和普适性。这本书真正做到的,是提供了一套全新的“社会诊断工具”,让我能够更清晰地识别出那些表面上风平浪静,实则内部结构已经僵化的社会病灶。它不仅是理论著作,更是一份唤醒公民责任感的行动指南。
评分这本书的论证过程真是引人深思,尤其是在探讨集体主义与个人自由之间的张力时,作者展现出了惊人的洞察力。我特别欣赏他没有采取简单化的二元对立视角,而是细致入微地剖析了社会进步往往源于内部的张力而非表面的和谐。那种将“异见”视为社会免疫系统的一部分的观点,着实颠覆了我以往对“共识”的理解。书中对历史案例的引用,比如某个特定时期知识分子的集体失语,分析得入木三分,让人不得不反思,我们现在所珍视的稳定,是否是以牺牲必要的批判声音为代价换来的。作者的笔触虽然冷静客观,但字里行间流露出的对真理的执着追求,极具感染力。读完后,我感到自己对日常生活中那些看似微不足道的争论,都有了更深层次的理解,不再轻易将反对意见视为麻烦制造,而是将其视为一种潜在的、有助于优化决策的“信息冗余”。这种思维方式的转变,对我日常的工作和思考都产生了积极的影响,让我更加警惕“群体思维”的陷阱。
评分这本书的叙事节奏把握得相当高明,虽然主题是相对抽象的社会学和政治哲学,但作者巧妙地穿插了许多富有戏剧性的个人故事和历史轶事,极大地增强了文本的可读性和情感的共鸣。我印象最深的是其中关于少数派“边缘化”如何从最初的无声抗议演变为最终推动社会范式转变的关键情节。那些被主流话语边缘化的声音,作者并没有将他们浪漫化为纯粹的英雄,而是将其置于社会变迁的复杂动力学中进行审视,这使得整个论述显得更加真实可信。特别是对“沉默的螺旋”效应的批判性分析,让我对媒体环境下的舆论形成有了更具批判性的视角。它迫使我思考,我所接收到的“主流意见”背后,隐藏了多少未被发出的声音,以及这些声音的缺失对我们决策质量造成了何种隐性损害。整体阅读体验是紧凑而富有启发性的,仿佛作者不断地在敲打我们对于“舒适区”的依赖。
评分我必须承认,这本书在某些章节的论证深度上,达到了令人叹服的程度,尤其是在探讨技术进步如何催生新的压制形式时,作者的远见令人不寒而栗。他没有沉溺于对传统压迫的批判,而是敏锐地指出了在高度互联的现代社会中,基于算法和数据流的“软性控制”是如何悄无声息地扼杀潜在的异议萌芽的。这种对未来社会形态的预警,是当前许多同类著作所缺乏的。这种前瞻性并非空泛的猜测,而是基于对现有社会权力结构的细致解构得出的必然推论。这本书的语言风格在这部分显得尤为锐利和直接,充满了紧迫感,仿佛在催促读者立即行动起来,重新审视我们对“透明度”和“效率”的盲目崇拜。对于热衷于未来学和科技伦理的读者来说,这本书提供了一个极具价值的理论框架,用以分析我们正走向何方。
评分从大众心理学,美国政治,教育,法制层面分析异见者存在的价值。Much of the time, it is the individual's interest to follow the crowd, but in the social interest for the individual to say and do what he thinks best.To promote dissent, to avoid conformity, cascades, and polarization is to protect interests of society as an intact organic entity. 用词很学术,蛮有模仿价值的。
评分我爲什麽會被要求讀這麼一本破書...完全就是粗淺心理學概念和美國歷史的結合。這些我沒上大學之前就讀過好多遍了好么。簡直是浪費時間。一讀就是美國人寫的書,毫無深度毫無建樹,更別提建構哲學概念。對這麼一個學術流行化的地方我實在是太反感了。
评分我爲什麽會被要求讀這麼一本破書...完全就是粗淺心理學概念和美國歷史的結合。這些我沒上大學之前就讀過好多遍了好么。簡直是浪費時間。一讀就是美國人寫的書,毫無深度毫無建樹,更別提建構哲學概念。對這麼一個學術流行化的地方我實在是太反感了。
评分我爲什麽會被要求讀這麼一本破書...完全就是粗淺心理學概念和美國歷史的結合。這些我沒上大學之前就讀過好多遍了好么。簡直是浪費時間。一讀就是美國人寫的書,毫無深度毫無建樹,更別提建構哲學概念。對這麼一個學術流行化的地方我實在是太反感了。
评分“异见人士”使用手册
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有