If you keep removing single grains of sand from a heap, when is it no longer a heap? From discussions of the heap paradox in classical Greece, to modern formal approaches like fuzzy logic, Timothy Williamson traces the history of the problem of vagueness. He argues that standard logic and formal semantics apply even to vague languages and defends the controversial, realist view that vagueness is a form of ignorance - there really is a grain of sand whose removal turns a heap into a non-heap, but we can never know exactly which one it is.
評分
評分
評分
評分
為瞭保證傳統認識論,引入瞭一定程度不可知論。
评分一般吧,沒什麼特彆有趣的東西。有些內容一看就不是很有趣
评分為瞭保證傳統認識論,引入瞭一定程度不可知論。
评分畢業論文參考資料
评分Williamson這本vagueness的文筆的確不是很好……有種理科生寫文章的感覺。認知主義作為解決模糊性的方案的確有長處,尤其是在保護二值原則和經典邏輯之處。不過還是太反直覺。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有