Social justice in the liberal state

Social justice in the liberal state pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

☆☆☆☆☆
出版者:Yale University Press
作者:Bruce Arnold Ackerman
出品人:
页数:416
译者:
出版时间:1980-7-1
价格:GBP 45.00
装帧:Hardcover
isbn号码:9780300024395
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 政治哲学
  • 社会正义
  • 自由主义
  • 政治哲学
  • 公平
  • 平等
  • 权利
  • 民主
  • 福利国家
  • 政治理论
  • 伦理学
想要找书就要到 图书目录大全
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

Social Justice in the Liberal State [1] is a book written by Bruce A. Ackerman, recipient of the French Order of Merit, [2] Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale, and the author of fifteen books that have had a broad influence in political philosophy, constitutional law, and public policy. [3] The book is an essay in political philosophy, [2] a "new view" of the theoretical foundations of liberalism that will "challenge us to clarify our own implicit notions of liberal democracy." [4] Ackerman addresses the positive case for a liberalism that glorifies neither the state bureaucracy nor the private market. References to the sphere of relations among states are few, but the breadth of the attack on the fundamental issues of man and society is impressive. [5] To Ackerman, liberalism is a kind of structured conversation in which verbal negotiation among those with differing visions of the good life is an alternative to the exercise of naked power. [6] Ackerman has mounted a profound challenge to contract thinking. It works, crudely, on the idea that the premises of a course of contract reasoning can be manipulated so as to yield (more or less) any conclusion that the theorist has some antecedent interest in producing. [7] The social contract is the contract which would be confirmed by the entire population, under ideal conditions, after perfect and complete consideration. [8] Ackerman has offered a suggestion for determining whether any persons among a genetically diverse group are genetically disadvantaged. His suggestion is that, to be genetically undominated, a person must possess a set of abilities that permit him to pursue some life purpose that some persons have, with as much facility as any other person is able to pursue that life purpose. And Ackerman asserts that every person has a right to be genetically undominated. [9] The privatization of religious convictions is also strongly defended. Ackerman argues for a maximal separation doctrine in that religion does not have an appropriate place in the public realm of a liberal democracy. [10] The book also briefly suggests [11] "responsive lotteries", [12] prototypes of lottery voting as a way to decide issues, but leaves the question hanging in the air, inviting others to devote more serious thought to lottery voting.[11]

该书《Social justice in the liberal state》深入探讨了社会正义在现代民主国家中的定位与实现路径。它以对现有理论框架的系统梳理和批判性分析为核心,通过历史视角与当代案例相结合,剖析了自由主义制度如何在维护个人权利与集体责任之间寻求平衡。这一书不仅关注社会公正的内涵,还详细考察了不同政治文化背景下,国家在推动平等机会、资源分配与制度变革方面所面临的复杂挑战。 作者通过严谨的文献综述与实证研究,揭示了自由主义体系中社会正义理念的演变过程,同时分析了政策制定者、法律法规以及公民参与在推动正义进程中的作用。这部分内容帮助读者理解正义不仅是一个抽象概念,更是嵌入于具体实践与制度设计中的动态过程。书中特别强调了公共政策对弱势群体的支持机制,并通过多样化的案例展示了社会正义在不同国家和文化背景下如何被实现或阻碍。 此外,这一作品还探讨了全球化与信息技术迅猛发展所带来的新问题,如数字鸿沟、隐私权与社会分配不公等,作者提出了一系列可行的改革思路,旨在增强民主制度对多样化需求的响应能力。书中引用了大量历史文献和学术论文,以确保内容的深度与权威性,同时为读者提供了丰富的理论工具和实际操作指南。 通过细致而全面的分析,《Social justice in the liberal state》不仅是一本关于社会公正的研究著作,更是对当代治理模式的一次深刻反思。它强调,只有在不断调整与优化中,才能让自由主义更有效地服务于全体公民的福祉。在这个过程中,政策制定者、学者和普通读者都应共同探索出适合自身社会环境的正义路径。整个书籍通过严谨的论证与生动的案例,为理解复杂的社会正义议题提供了有力支持,并为未来的政策设计与学术研究指明了方向。 该书的内容结构丰富,既涵盖了理论层面的深度分析,也注重实践应用的指导,使其成为对读者理解自由主义与社会公正关系的重要资源。这种细致的探讨,不仅帮助人们更好地把握当前社会发展的方向,也为未来可能出现的伦理困境和制度挑战提供了思考的空间。通过全面而详实的写作,作者成功地展示了在自由主义框架下实现真正社会正义的复杂性与重要性。

作者简介

Bruce Arnold Ackerman (born August 19, 1943) is a famous constitutional law scholar in the United States. He is a Sterling Professor at Yale Law School and one of the most frequently cited legal academics in the country.

目录信息

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

1、Ackerman说自由主义理论应该围绕Neutral dialogue重新组织,关涉权力的分配。权力的运作是合法的,只有权力持有人能在对话中诉诸中立的理由来辩护之。当诉诸当事人或当事人的善观念的优越性时,理由就不是中立的。 2、Ackerman有一个很清楚的预设:除非当事人肯定自身或自身...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

1、Ackerman说自由主义理论应该围绕Neutral dialogue重新组织,关涉权力的分配。权力的运作是合法的,只有权力持有人能在对话中诉诸中立的理由来辩护之。当诉诸当事人或当事人的善观念的优越性时,理由就不是中立的。 2、Ackerman有一个很清楚的预设:除非当事人肯定自身或自身...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

1、Ackerman说自由主义理论应该围绕Neutral dialogue重新组织,关涉权力的分配。权力的运作是合法的,只有权力持有人能在对话中诉诸中立的理由来辩护之。当诉诸当事人或当事人的善观念的优越性时,理由就不是中立的。 2、Ackerman有一个很清楚的预设:除非当事人肯定自身或自身...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

1、Ackerman说自由主义理论应该围绕Neutral dialogue重新组织,关涉权力的分配。权力的运作是合法的,只有权力持有人能在对话中诉诸中立的理由来辩护之。当诉诸当事人或当事人的善观念的优越性时,理由就不是中立的。 2、Ackerman有一个很清楚的预设:除非当事人肯定自身或自身...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

1、Ackerman说自由主义理论应该围绕Neutral dialogue重新组织,关涉权力的分配。权力的运作是合法的,只有权力持有人能在对话中诉诸中立的理由来辩护之。当诉诸当事人或当事人的善观念的优越性时,理由就不是中立的。 2、Ackerman有一个很清楚的预设:除非当事人肯定自身或自身...

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等

© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有