The first truly authoritative and accessible history of philosophy to cover both Western and Eastern traditions
'If there is any such person in Britain as The Thinking Man, it is A. C. Grayling' - The Times
The story of philosophy is an epic tale: an exploration of the ideas, views and teachings of some of the most creative minds known to humanity. But since the long-popular classic Bertrand Russell's History of Western Philosophy, first published in 1945, there has been no comprehensive and entertaining, single-volume history of this great intellectual journey.
With his characteristic clarity and elegance A. C. Grayling takes the reader from the world-views and moralities before the age of the Buddha, Confucius and Socrates, through Christianity's dominance of the European mind to the Renaissance and Enlightenment, and on to Mill, Nietzsche, Sartre, and philosophy today. And, since the story of philosophy is incomplete without mention of the great philosophical traditions of India, China and the Persian-Arabic world, he gives a comparative survey of them too.
Intelligible for students and eye-opening for philosophy readers, he covers epistemology, metaphysics, ethics, aesthetics, logic, the philosophy of mind, the philosophy of language, political philosophy and the history of debates in these areas of enquiry, through the ideas of the celebrated philosophers as well as less well-known influential thinkers. He also asks what we have learnt from this body of thought, and what progress is still to be made.
The first authoritative and accessible single-volume history of philosophy for decades, remarkable for its range and clarity, this is a landmark work.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
标准明晰，会判断哲学家成果的好坏对错（思想史警告），概念在各时代间保持联通（这当然也会带来很大的危险），确实很适合入门。作者要对标罗素的哲学史，在行文上确实都不惮于偏离标准叙事，但较罗素还是更为克制。其实可以预料到一个分析哲学进路的人会是什么样的史观…但还是在苏格拉底-柏拉图部分读得吐血。详见今年将出的中文版的译后记…
评分标准明晰，会判断哲学家成果的好坏对错（思想史警告），概念在各时代间保持联通（这当然也会带来很大的危险），确实很适合入门。作者要对标罗素的哲学史，在行文上确实都不惮于偏离标准叙事，但较罗素还是更为克制。其实可以预料到一个分析哲学进路的人会是什么样的史观…但还是在苏格拉底-柏拉图部分读得吐血。详见今年将出的中文版的译后记…
评分标准明晰，会判断哲学家成果的好坏对错（思想史警告），概念在各时代间保持联通（这当然也会带来很大的危险），确实很适合入门。作者要对标罗素的哲学史，在行文上确实都不惮于偏离标准叙事，但较罗素还是更为克制。其实可以预料到一个分析哲学进路的人会是什么样的史观…但还是在苏格拉底-柏拉图部分读得吐血。详见今年将出的中文版的译后记…
评分标准明晰，会判断哲学家成果的好坏对错（思想史警告），概念在各时代间保持联通（这当然也会带来很大的危险），确实很适合入门。作者要对标罗素的哲学史，在行文上确实都不惮于偏离标准叙事，但较罗素还是更为克制。其实可以预料到一个分析哲学进路的人会是什么样的史观…但还是在苏格拉底-柏拉图部分读得吐血。详见今年将出的中文版的译后记…
评分标准明晰，会判断哲学家成果的好坏对错（思想史警告），概念在各时代间保持联通（这当然也会带来很大的危险），确实很适合入门。作者要对标罗素的哲学史，在行文上确实都不惮于偏离标准叙事，但较罗素还是更为克制。其实可以预料到一个分析哲学进路的人会是什么样的史观…但还是在苏格拉底-柏拉图部分读得吐血。详见今年将出的中文版的译后记…
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有