Although we have come to regard 'clinical' and 'romantic' as oppositional terms, romantic literature and clinical medicine were fed by the same cultural configurations. In the pre-Darwinian nineteenth century, writers and doctors developed an interpretive method that negotiated between literary and scientific knowledge of the natural world. Literary writers produced potent myths that juxtaposed the natural and the supernatural, often disturbing the conventional dualist hierarchy of spirit over flesh. Clinicians developed the two-part history and physical examination, weighing the patient's narrative against the evidence of the body. Examining fiction by Mary Shelley, Carlyle, the Brontes and George Eliot, alongside biomedical lectures, textbooks and articles, Janis McLarren Caldwell demonstrates the similar ways of reading employed by nineteenth-century doctors and imaginative writers and reveals the complexities and creative exchanges of the relationship between literature and medicine.
评分
评分
评分
评分
Exploration of spiritual and corporeal relationship through reference to or connotation of intersection between theology and medicine in Romantic literary pieces.
评分Exploration of spiritual and corporeal relationship through reference to or connotation of intersection between theology and medicine in Romantic literary pieces.
评分Exploration of spiritual and corporeal relationship through reference to or connotation of intersection between theology and medicine in Romantic literary pieces.
评分Exploration of spiritual and corporeal relationship through reference to or connotation of intersection between theology and medicine in Romantic literary pieces.
评分哲学和阐释学框架我个人觉得使用的篇幅有点多。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有