The field of judgment and decision making is fragmented and researchers may not be aware of the wider context in which the approaches they predominately adopt can be placed, or the relative utility of different approaches to studying human judgment. The present special issue intends to: present, with empirical examples, four different approaches to modelling human judgment; compare the portrayal of the nature of human judgment using these approaches, for example in terms of the predictability of human judgment, the use of information, and human judges' ability to describe and understand the models of their judgment data; discuss the relative merits and limitations of these approaches in terms of their ability to describe and predict human judgment behaviour, and discuss the compatibility of these approaches. Each paper will characterise the research carried out in a tradition and will describe recent research using the technique to modelling human judgment and decision making. The four approaches are: static or structural, dynamic, process tracing and simple heuristics. Two discussions will each pull together the work of these different "groups" of researchers. Nigel Harvey will discuss the relative merits and limitations of each approach as they have been presented by the authors. John Maule will discuss the more general issues that need to be taken into account when choosing between different approaches.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有