Review
"With Eyes Upside Down, P. Adams Sitney reconfirms his position as the dean of American film historiography. His recasting of the canon as the elaboration of an Emersonian Orphism will transform our understanding of American culture as a whole, not just of its cinematic avatars. The largesse of his critical intelligence, of his erudition, and of his sensitivity to both poetry and film reaches 'peaks of perfect exhilaration' as remarkable in their own way as those in the films he illuminates."--David James, University of Southern California
"P. Adams Sitney is not only the preeminent historian of the American avant-garde film; he is one of the finest critics and theorists of the cinematic image and form working today. In Eyes Upside Down Sitney does more than supplement and extend his seminal work, Visionary Film, widely recognized as the canonical account of American avant-garde cinema. In this new volume Sitney not only deals with many filmmakers that were not treated in his earlier book, he also provides a new profound approach to the American avant-garde film as part of an Emersonian tradition. In addition, Sitney offers a deep, and deeply moving, expansion of his work on Stan Brakhage, a profound tribute of the critical imagination to one of America's richest and least appreciated masters of modern form."--Tom Gunning, University of Chicago
Review
"With Eyes Upside Down, P. Adams Sitney reconfirms his position as the dean of American film historiography. His recasting of the canon as the elaboration of an Emersonian Orphism will transform our understanding of American culture as a whole, not just of its cinematic avatars. The largesse of his critical intelligence, of his erudition, and of his sensitivity to both poetry and film reaches 'peaks of perfect exhilaration' as remarkable in their own way as those in the films he illuminates."--David James, University of Southern California
"P. Adams Sitney is not only the preeminent historian of the American avant-garde film; he is one of the finest critics and theorists of the cinematic image and form working today. In Eyes Upside Down Sitney does more than supplement and extend his seminal work, Visionary Film, widely recognized as the canonical account of American avant-garde cinema. In this new volume Sitney not only deals with many filmmakers that were not treated in his earlier book, he also provides a new profound approach to the American avant-garde film as part of an Emersonian tradition. In addition, Sitney offers a deep, and deeply moving, expansion of his work on Stan Brakhage, a profound tribute of the critical imagination to one of America's richest and least appreciated masters of modern form."--Tom Gunning, University of Chicago
Review
"With Eyes Upside Down, P. Adams Sitney reconfirms his position as the dean of American film historiography. His recasting of the canon as the elaboration of an Emersonian Orphism will transform our understanding of American culture as a whole, not just of its cinematic avatars. The largesse of his critical intelligence, of his erudition, and of his sensitivity to both poetry and film reaches 'peaks of perfect exhilaration' as remarkable in their own way as those in the films he illuminates."--David James, University of Southern California
"P. Adams Sitney is not only the preeminent historian of the American avant-garde film; he is one of the finest critics and theorists of the cinematic image and form working today. In Eyes Upside Down Sitney does more than supplement and extend his seminal work, Visionary Film, widely recognized as the canonical account of American avant-garde cinema. In this new volume Sitney not only deals with many filmmakers that were not treated in his earlier book, he also provides a new profound approach to the American avant-garde film as part of an Emersonian tradition. In addition, Sitney offers a deep, and deeply moving, expansion of his work on Stan Brakhage, a profound tribute of the critical imagination to one of America's richest and least appreciated masters of modern form."--Tom Gunning, University of Chicago
Product Description
Sitney analyzes in detail the work of eleven American avant-garde filmmakers as heirs to the aesthetics of exhilaration and innovative vision articulated by Ralph Waldo Emerson and explored by John Cage and Gertrude Stein. The films discussed span the sixty years since the Second World War. With three chapters each devoted to Stan Brakhage and Robert Beavers, two each to Hollis Frampton and Jonas Mekas, and single chapters on Marie Menken, Ian Hugo, Andrew Noren, Warren Sonbert, Su Friedrich, Ernie Gehr, and Abigail Child, Eyes Upside Down is the fruit of Sitney's lifelong study of visionary aspirations of the American avant-garde cinema. Sitney's earlier book and critical essays defined the field of serious criticism of the American film avant-garde. He supplies a unique approach, critical, formal and intellectual, rather than sociological, ideological or institutional. Like his earlier book, Eyes Upside Down is a dense, sustained blast of convincing criticism which unfolds through a compelling personal vision. It makes a serious contribution to cinema studies and it is sure to remain in circulation for many years to come.
评分
评分
评分
评分
初翻开这本书,我立刻被那种迷离而疏离的笔触所吸引。它没有那种传统小说开篇的热闹或悬念,反而是用一种近乎诗意的、却又带着某种冰冷精确度的语言,搭建起一个充满隐喻的场域。我感觉作者仿佛是一位技艺高超的建筑师,他设计的不是实体建筑,而是情绪的迷宫。阅读的体验是碎片化的,但这并非是叙事混乱,而是有意为之,就像是把一块块打磨光滑的宝石散落在桌面上,你需要自己去寻找它们之间的内在联系和光线折射的角度。书中对环境的描写尤为出色,那些建筑、天气、乃至光线的变化,都不仅仅是背景,它们更像是角色的延伸,是他们内在冲突的外化。我常常需要停下来,反复咀嚼某一个段落,因为它似乎蕴含着超越字面意思的深意。这本书不太适合喜欢被“牵着走”的读者,它要求你拿出自己的思考工具,去参与到意义的构建过程中。读完后,我需要很长一段时间才能将自己从那种独特的“时空感”中抽离出来,回味那些未被明说却又清晰可见的情感暗流。
评分这本书给我的感受是强烈的“疏离美学”。作者的笔力非常老道,但他的情感表达却极其克制,像是在用冰冷的科学仪器去测量一场火山爆发的精确数据。这种反差产生了奇特的阅读张力。书中对空间布局的描绘达到了令人惊叹的程度,无论是拥挤的城市角落还是空旷的荒野,都仿佛被作者用精确的几何图形勾勒出来,每一个角落都充满了潜在的叙事能量。我最欣赏的是,作者从未试图提供任何简单的答案或安慰,他只是忠实地记录下那些存在的矛盾和人性的灰色地带。这使得整个故事充满了未解的张力,让你在合上书本之后,脑海中依然在嗡嗡作响,试图为那些留白处填上自己的理解。这本书不迎合大众,它更像是在与一小部分“同类”进行心照不宣的交流,如果你能进入到那个频率,它会带给你一次极其纯粹、未经污染的阅读体验。
评分这本书的叙事结构,在我看来,更接近于一部结构主义的电影脚本,而非传统的文学作品。它充满了镜像和重复的母题,但每一次的重复都不是简单的循环,而是在新的语境下被赋予了细微的、几乎难以察觉的变异,这正是其精妙之处。作者对心理状态的捕捉达到了令人毛骨悚然的程度,他能将那种潜意识中的不安、被压抑的欲望,用一种近乎冷酷的客观视角呈现出来,让你在代入感和旁观者视角之间不断切换。我特别喜欢其中一些富有象征意义的道具和场景,它们在不同的章节中反复出现,但其意义却随着情节的发展而悄然演变,仿佛在引导读者进行一场深层次的符号解读游戏。阅读过程需要极大的耐心去梳理那些看似不经意的细节,但一旦串联起来,那种豁然开朗的感觉是其他作品难以比拟的。这本书无疑是献给那些热爱深挖文本肌理,并享受在复杂性中寻找秩序的读者的。
评分这部作品读来,感觉就像是作者在用一把精巧的刻刀,小心翼翼地雕琢着人性的复杂侧面。它不像某些小说那样直白地抛出主题,而是更倾向于铺陈一种氛围,一种让人在阅读过程中不断产生疑问、又不得不沉浸其中的独特语境。叙事节奏的处理非常高明,时而如涓涓细流般细腻地描摹日常琐碎,让人感觉时间仿佛慢了下来,能清晰地捕捉到角色内心微小的波动;而到了关键时刻,节奏又会骤然加快,信息量和情感冲击力如潮水般涌来,让人措手不及。我特别欣赏作者在构建世界观时所展现出的那种“不动声色”的功力,你不会被冗长的背景介绍所累,而是随着主角的每一次呼吸、每一次选择,自然而然地进入到那个精心构建的框架之中,这种沉浸感极强。书中的人物群像塑造得尤为立体,他们身上的优点和缺陷都像是被放在显微镜下观察过,真实得让人感到不安,你甚至能从中看到自己生活中某些不愿面对的影子。总的来说,这本书更像是一场需要全神贯注的智力与情感的双重冒险,它考验读者的耐心,但最终给予的回报是深刻的共鸣和对现实更深层次的理解。
评分坦白说,这本书的阅读门槛不低,初读时甚至有些晦涩难懂,但越往后读,我越能感受到作者那种近乎偏执的掌控力。它探讨的主题宏大而深邃,关于记忆的可靠性、身份的构建与解构,但作者没有采用说教的方式,而是通过一系列精妙的场景设计和人物间的微妙互动来展现这些哲学思考。我尤其欣赏作者在处理时间线上的手法,那些穿插的回溯和跳跃,初看时略显混乱,但当你代入角色的视角时,便能理解这种时间感的错乱正是角色内心挣扎的最佳注脚。书中的对话简直是一门艺术,台词看似平淡,实则暗流涌动,每个人说的每一句话都带着多重目的,表面上在谈论A,实际上可能在试探B,这种张力让人看得非常过瘾。这本书像是一部精密的钟表,每一个齿轮(情节点)都必须咬合得天衣无缝,一旦错位,整个结构都会崩塌。它需要你保持绝对的专注力,回报你的,是对叙事艺术的全新认知。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有