"[Scott] might be called the Aristotle of documentary. No one before him has so comprehensively surveyed the achievement of the 1930s, suggesting what should be admired, what condemned, and why; no one else has so persuasively furnished an aesthetic for judging the form."—Times Literary Supplement
"A comprehensive inquiry into the attitudes and ambitions that characterized the documentary impulse of the thirties. The subject is a large one, for it embraces (among much else) radical journalism, academic sociology, the esthetics of photography, Government relief programs, radio broadcasting, the literature of social work, the rhetoric of political persuasion, and the effect of all these on the traditional arts of literature, painting, theater and dance. The great merit of Mr. Stott's study lies precisely in its wide-ranging view of this complex terrain."—Hilton Kramer, New York Times Book Review
评分
评分
评分
评分
Historical critical analysis, 30s的语境很不熟悉……不过作者的points很精彩,对两种stream的documentary photography的critique很有趣,although sometimes甚至有感情色彩的preference.
评分Historical critical analysis, 30s的语境很不熟悉……不过作者的points很精彩,对两种stream的documentary photography的critique很有趣,although sometimes甚至有感情色彩的preference.
评分入门。前两张讲什么是documentary,human documentary和social documentary的区别。12章详谈You Have Seen Their Faces,感觉有点偏激了。
评分Historical critical analysis, 30s的语境很不熟悉……不过作者的points很精彩,对两种stream的documentary photography的critique很有趣,although sometimes甚至有感情色彩的preference.
评分入门。前两张讲什么是documentary,human documentary和social documentary的区别。12章详谈You Have Seen Their Faces,感觉有点偏激了。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有