<DIV>In Experiencing Fiction, James Phelan develops a provocative and engaging affirmative answer to the question, “Can we experience narrative fiction in similar ways?” Phelan grounds that answer in two elements of narrative located at the intersection between authorial design and reader response: judgments and progressions. Phelan contends that focusing on the three main kinds of judgment—interpretive, ethical, and aesthetic—and on the principles underlying a narrative’s movement from beginning to end reveals the experience of reading fiction to be potentially sharable. In Part One, Phelan skillfully analyzes progressions and judgments in narratives with a high degree of narrativity: Jane Austen’s Persuasion, Toni Morrison’s Beloved, Edith Wharton’s “Roman Fever,” and Ian McEwan’s Atonement. In Part Two, Phelan turns his attention to the different relationships between judgments and progressions in hybrid forms—in the lyric narratives of Ernest Hemingway’s “A Clean, Well-Lighted Place,” Sandra Cisneros’s “Woman Hollering Creek,” and Robert Frost’s “Home Burial,” and in the portrait narratives of Alice Munro’s “Prue” and Ann Beattie’s “Janus.” More generally, Phelan moves back and forth between the exploration of theoretical principles and the detailed work of interpretation. As a result, Experiencing Fiction combines Phelan’s fresh and compelling readings of numerous innovative narratives with his fullest articulation of the rhetorical theory of narrative.<DIV> <DIV> </DIV>
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
敘事學理論是文本細讀典範。不過論證邏輯很容易外露，容易被抓住馬腳，不像以哲學為導嚮的文學批評那麼艱澀隱晦、泥沙俱下。費倫這本不夠勁兒。
评分敘事學理論是文本細讀典範。不過論證邏輯很容易外露，容易被抓住馬腳，不像以哲學為導嚮的文學批評那麼艱澀隱晦、泥沙俱下。費倫這本不夠勁兒。
评分敘事學理論是文本細讀典範。不過論證邏輯很容易外露，容易被抓住馬腳，不像以哲學為導嚮的文學批評那麼艱澀隱晦、泥沙俱下。費倫這本不夠勁兒。
评分敘事學理論是文本細讀典範。不過論證邏輯很容易外露，容易被抓住馬腳，不像以哲學為導嚮的文學批評那麼艱澀隱晦、泥沙俱下。費倫這本不夠勁兒。
评分敘事學理論是文本細讀典範。不過論證邏輯很容易外露，容易被抓住馬腳，不像以哲學為導嚮的文學批評那麼艱澀隱晦、泥沙俱下。費倫這本不夠勁兒。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有