The Wealth and Poverty of Nations pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

戴维·S·兰德斯，美国哈佛大学历史学和经济学教授，著有《时间的革命》和《摆脱束缚的普罗米修斯》等书。

出版者:Abacus

作者:David S. Landes

出品人:

页数:672

译者:

出版时间:1999-4-1

价格:GBP 15.99

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780349111667

丛书系列:

图书标签:

社会学
经济史
经济
历史
英文原版
财经
文明
文化

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到图书目录大全

book.wenda123.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

The history of nations is a history of haves and have-nots, and as we approach the millennium, the gap between rich and poor countries is widening. In this engrossing and important new work, eminent historian David Landes explores the complex, fascinating and often startling causes of the wealth and poverty of nations. The answers are found not only in the large forces at work in economies: geography, religion, the broad swings of politics, but also in the small surprising details. In Europe, the invention of spectacles doubled the working life of skilled craftsmen, and played a prominent role in the creation of articulated machines, and in China, the failure to adopt the clock fundamentally hindered economic development. The relief of poverty is vital to the survival of us all. As David Landes brilliantly shows, the key to future success lies in understanding the lessons the past has to teach us - lessons uniquely imparted in this groundbreaking and vital book which exemplifies narrative history at its best.

具体描述

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

I'm very interested in what caused the difference between North and Latin America(both were European colonies before their respective independence)...after reading The Wealth and Poverty of Nations, I think the author blames Latin America's backwardness on ...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

书的封底有人评论说此书堪比《国富论》，我认为这个评价太高了。先不谈《国富论》具有的开创性的地位，它本身就包含了很多的思想性。但这本“新国富论”，基本就是经济和历史的结合，没包含多少思想，只是作者把两者结合的比较好，读起来有种新鲜感。而这，也是我推荐一读...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

一部世界经济史，最大的感悟就是中国曾经的衰败与其悠久的历史有很大的关系。长期以来的封建思想，似乎那种奴役的心态已经根深蒂固了，当有新事物出现的时候，没有形成强大的动力和突破力让它发展，而是一无既往的承受压迫，而且乐此不疲。自由，不管在思想上和行为上，都没有...

评分☆☆☆☆☆