"Political clientelism" is a term used to characterise the contemporary relationships between political elites and the poor in Latin America in which goods and services are traded for political favours. Javier Auyero critically deploys the notion in "Poor People's Politics" to analyse the political practices of the Peronist Party among shantytown dwellers in contemporary Argentina. Looking closely at the slum-dwellers' informal problem-solving networks that are necessary for material survival and the different meaning of Peronism within these networks, Auyero presents the first ethnography of urban clientelism ever carried out in Argentina. Revealing a deep familiarity with the lives of the urban poor in Villa Paraiso, a stigmatised and destitute shantytown of Buenos Aires, Auyero demonstrates the ways in which local politicians present their vital favors to the poor and how the poor perceive and evaluate these favours.Having penetrated the networks, he describes how they are structured, what is traded, and the particular way in which women facilitate these transactions. Moreover, Auyero proposes that the act of granting favors or giving food in return for votes gives the politicians' acts a performative and symbolic meaning that flavours the relation between problem-solver and problem-holder, while also creating quite different versions of contemporary Peronism. Along the way, Auyero is careful to situate the emergence and consolidation of clientelism in historic, cultural, and economic contexts. "Poor People's Politics" re-examines the relationship between politics and the destitute in Latin America, showing how deeply embedded politics are in the lives of those who do not mobilise in the usual sense of the word but who are far from passive. It will appeal to a wide range of students and scholars of Latin American studies, sociology, anthropology, political science, history, and cultural studies.
评分
评分
评分
评分
看来党校是个新田野,前有五公村,后有什么?
评分用布迪厄和戈夫曼的理论来解释clientalism都属于泛泛而谈。文化上的解释不能替代clientalism产生的经济社会的结构性原因。但是我很喜欢作者将clientalism与党的动员方式的转变联系在一起的做法。觉得国内也需要一个关于基层党组织的民族志。
评分看来党校是个新田野,前有五公村,后有什么?
评分看来党校是个新田野,前有五公村,后有什么?
评分用布迪厄和戈夫曼的理论来解释clientalism都属于泛泛而谈。文化上的解释不能替代clientalism产生的经济社会的结构性原因。但是我很喜欢作者将clientalism与党的动员方式的转变联系在一起的做法。觉得国内也需要一个关于基层党组织的民族志。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有