The aim of this book is to highlight and begin to give 'voice' to some of the notable 'silences' evident in recent years in the study of contentious politics. The seven co-authors take up seven specific topics in the volume: the relationship between emotions and contention; temporality in the study of contention; the spatial dimensions of contention; leadership in contention; the role of threat in contention; religion and contention; and contention in the context of demographic and life-course processes. The seven spent three years involved in an ongoing project designed to take stock, and attempt a partial synthesis, of various literatures that have grown up around the study of non-routine or contentious politics. As such, it is likely to be viewed as a groundbreaking volume that not only undermines conventional disciplinary understanding of contentious politics, but also lays out a number of provocative new research agendas.
评分
评分
评分
评分
《沉默与发声:论断政治研究中的声音与沉默》这个书名,给我一种“聆听风暴前的寂静”的预感。在政治学的研究中,我们常常热衷于捕捉那些激烈的抗议、响亮的口号、以及公开的诉求,这些都是显性的“发声”。然而,这本书的标题暗示了,在这些喧嚣之下,可能存在着更为深刻和复杂的“沉默”,而这种沉默本身就具有重要的政治意义。我非常期待本书能够深入探究,“沉默”在断政治研究中究竟扮演着怎样的角色。它是否仅仅是缺乏信息或未能有效组织的结果,还是可能是一种主动的策略?例如,在信息封锁或高压统治下,沉默可能是一种生存之道,一种保存力量的策略。又或者,它是一种对主流话语的无声拒绝,一种“不被看见”的抗争。Moreover, the book's focus on "contentious politics" promises an exploration of moments of significant social and political upheaval. In such contexts, the interplay between silence and voice is likely to be crucial in shaping outcomes. I am particularly interested in how the author examines the relationship between these two phenomena. Does the emergence of voice tend to break down existing silences, or can silence sometimes overwhelm and negate the impact of voices? I hope the book provides a sophisticated theoretical framework for understanding these dynamics, and perhaps uses compelling case studies to illustrate the nuances of how silence and voice are strategically deployed and experienced by different actors in contentious political situations. The title itself hints at a more sophisticated analysis of power, agency, and resistance than might be found in studies that solely focus on overt forms of political expression. I am looking forward to discovering how the author navigates the complexities of this often-overlooked dimension of political life.
评分《沉默与发声:论断政治研究中的声音与沉默》这个书名,给我一种“静水流深”的哲学韵味,以及对政治研究中被边缘化视角的关注。在惯常的政治分析中,我们常常将目光聚焦于那些公开的抗争、激烈的辩论、以及清晰可见的动员,也就是“发声”。然而,“沉默”这个概念,却常常被忽视,或者被简单地视为缺乏行动。这本书的标题将“沉默”与“发声”并列,并置于“断政治”的语境中,预示着它将对沉默进行更深入、更具批判性的审视。我非常期待作者能够详细阐述,“沉默”在断政治中究竟扮演着怎样的角色,以及它可能具有的多种含义。沉默是否可以是一种策略性的选择,例如为了规避风险、保存力量、等待时机?它是否是在压迫下无法发声的被动体现?抑或是,它本身就是一种有意识的、消极的抗争形式?Moreover, the book's focus on "contentious politics" suggests a deep dive into periods of social and political conflict. In such volatile environments, the interplay between silence and voice is likely to be profoundly influential in shaping political trajectories. I am particularly interested in how the author will explain the dynamic relationship between these two seemingly opposing forces. Does the emergence of voice inevitably lead to the dismantling of silence, or can silence possess its own potent form of agency? I hope the book provides a sophisticated theoretical framework and compelling empirical examples that illustrate the complex ways in which silence and voice are strategically utilized and experienced by various actors within contentious political landscapes. The title itself hints at a departure from conventional, surface-level analyses of political phenomena, and I eagerly anticipate uncovering the nuanced insights it promises. The allure of understanding the power of the unspoken in shaping political events is considerable.
评分《沉默与发声:论断政治研究中的声音与沉默》这个书名,一下子就抓住了我对政治研究中那些“看不见的”力量的浓厚兴趣。我们通常习惯于关注那些公开的抗议、激烈的辩论、以及具有号召力的领导者,也就是“发声”的群体。然而,这本书将“沉默”与“发声”并列,并置于“断政治”的语境中,这强烈暗示着一种对传统研究视角的挑战,以及对政治场域复杂性的深刻认识。我非常期待作者能够深入分析,“沉默”在断政治中究竟具有怎样的多重含义和功能。沉默是否可以是一种策略性的选择,例如在高压环境下为了规避风险、保存力量而采取的“不作为”?它是否是在缺乏话语权或组织能力时,个体和群体被动“噤声”的体现?抑或是,它本身就是一种有意识的、消极的抗争,是对主流话语的拒绝?Furthermore, the book's focus on "contentious politics" signals a commitment to exploring periods of significant social and political conflict. In these dynamic situations, the interaction between silence and voice is likely to be a crucial determinant of outcomes. I am eager to learn how the author will dissect the relationship between these two concepts. Does the amplification of voice necessarily lead to the eradication of silence, or can silence itself exert a powerful influence on the narrative and direction of political events? I hope the book offers a sophisticated theoretical framework, enriched by compelling case studies, to illuminate the intricate ways in which silence and voice are strategically employed and experienced by different actors within contentious political contexts. The title alone suggests a sophisticated exploration of the often-overlooked dimensions of political engagement, and I am anticipating a truly insightful read. The prospect of understanding the influence of the unspoken in shaping political transformations is highly appealing.
评分《沉默与发声:论断政治研究中的声音与沉默》这个书名,让我立刻联想到那些在宏大的政治叙事中被忽略的个体和群体。我们习惯于聚焦于那些公开表达、积极参与的“声音”,但“沉默”本身,却可能是一种强大的政治力量,或者是一种被压迫的深刻体现。这本书将“沉默”与“发声”并列,并置于“断政治”的研究语境中,这让我对其内容充满了好奇和期待。我希望这本书能够深入探讨,“沉默”在断政治中究竟具有哪些多重含义和功能。它是否仅仅是缺乏信息的表现,抑或是策略性的选择?例如,在某些极端的政治环境下,沉默可能是一种生存策略,是为了避免风险,保存力量。又或者,它是一种消极的抵制,是对主流话语的拒绝。Furthermore, the book's emphasis on "contentious politics" suggests an examination of periods of social and political conflict. In such times, the interplay between silence and voice is likely to be a critical factor in determining the course of events. I am eager to learn how the author analyzes the ways in which voice can challenge and break down silence, and conversely, how silence can influence or even undermine the impact of voices. I hope the book offers a nuanced theoretical framework that can help us understand the complex dynamics between these two phenomena, potentially through compelling case studies that illustrate how different actors strategically employ both silence and voice in their political endeavors. The title itself promises a departure from simplistic analyses of political engagement, and I look forward to a deeper exploration of the often-unseen forces that shape political outcomes. The potential to uncover hidden narratives and understand the power of the unspoken is a significant draw.
评分《沉默与发声:论断政治研究中的声音与沉默》这个书名,直接点燃了我对于政治研究中那些“看不见”的因素的兴趣。我们惯常关注政治运动中的组织、动员、抗议口号,但“沉默”作为一个概念,却常常被简单地视为缺乏信息或参与。这本书的标题将“沉默”与“发声”并列,并置于“断政治”的语境下,预示着它将深入探讨沉默背后蕴含的政治意义和策略。我非常期待本书能够详细阐述“沉默”在断政治中的不同表现形式和功能。例如,沉默是否可以是一种策略性的选择,是为了规避风险、保存力量,等待时机?或者,它是否是由于压迫、边缘化而无法发声的被动状态?甚至,它是否可以是一种有意识的、消极的抗争,是对主流话语的拒绝?Furthermore, the book's focus on "contentious politics" implies an examination of moments of intense social and political conflict. In such scenarios, the decision to speak or to remain silent can have profound implications. I am eager to learn how the author analyzes the factors that influence these decisions and the subsequent impact on the dynamics of political struggles. How does the emergence of voice affect existing silences, and how do silences, in turn, shape the nature and reception of voices? I am particularly interested in whether the book will explore the power dynamics inherent in the production and suppression of both silence and voice. Who has the power to enforce silence, and who possesses the agency to break through it and amplify their voice? I hope the author provides a robust theoretical framework and compelling case studies to illustrate these intricate relationships, offering a more nuanced understanding of political engagement beyond overt actions. The title itself suggests a move towards a more holistic and sophisticated analysis of political phenomena.
评分《沉默与发声:论断政治研究中的声音与沉默》这个书名,让我感受到了一种对政治研究中被忽视维度的深度关注。我们常常习惯于分析政治运动中的动员、组织、诉求和领导力,但“沉默”这个概念,似乎总是游离在主流的分析框架之外,被当作一种缺乏信息或未被激活的潜在力量。这本书的标题却将“沉默”与“发声”并列,并置于“断政治”的研究语境中,这本身就暗示了一种对传统视角的挑战,以及对政治场域复杂性的深刻洞察。我非常期待作者能够深入探讨,“沉默”在断政治中究竟扮演着怎样的角色。它是否仅仅是被动压抑的体现,还是可能是一种积极的策略?例如,在某些高压环境下,沉默可能是一种规避风险、保存力量的策略;在另一些情况下,沉默则可能是对主流话语的无声抵抗,是一种拒绝被定义、被代表的姿态。Furthermore, the book's promise to analyze "voice" within contentious politics suggests a focus on how individuals and groups articulate their grievances, aspirations, and opposition. I am eager to understand how the author defines and categorizes different forms of voice. Are we talking about organized protests, clandestine communications, artistic expressions, or even subtle everyday acts of defiance? The relationship between voice and silence in these contexts is particularly fascinating. How does the emergence of voice impact existing silences, and vice versa? Does the amplification of certain voices inherently contribute to the silencing of others? I hope the book delves into the power dynamics that shape who gets to speak, whose voices are heard, and whose remain marginalized or entirely suppressed. The very notion of "contentious politics" implies a struggle for power and recognition, and I anticipate that the book will shed light on how the strategic deployment of both silence and voice plays a crucial role in these struggles. The title itself suggests a departure from simplistic analyses of political engagement, and I am eager to explore the nuanced arguments and empirical evidence that the author will present to illuminate this complex interplay.
评分从书名《沉默与发声:论断政治研究中的声音与沉默》来看,我对于这本书将如何解构“沉默”这一概念,赋予其政治意义,充满了浓厚的兴趣。在多数的政治研究中,我们往往聚焦于那些显性化的抗争、动员和诉求,那些“发声”的群体和事件。然而,沉默并非单纯的“无”,它可能是一种策略,一种抗议的姿态,一种在特定权力结构下无法发声的困境,甚至是集体被压抑的记忆。我期待这本书能够打破这种思维定势,为我们揭示沉默背后隐藏的丰富层次和复杂动因。作者是否会探讨,不同社会群体在面对政治压迫或不公时,会选择何种形式的沉默?是主动的、策略性的沉默,以规避风险、保存实力,等待时机?还是被动的、被迫的沉默,源于恐惧、边缘化,或是缺乏组织能力?“断政治”这个关键词,也预示着本书将聚焦于那些充满争议、冲突和不确定性的政治时刻。在这些时刻,声音与沉默的交织,无疑是驱动事件发展、塑造政治后果的关键变量。我非常好奇,作者将如何分析声音的出现对沉默的打破,以及沉默的存在又如何制约或改变声音的表达。是声音的洪亮能压倒一切沉默,还是沉默的厚重能成为一种更具颠覆性的力量?这本书的标题本身就给我带来了丰富的想象空间,我希望它能提供一些新颖的视角和深刻的洞见,帮助我更全面、更辩证地理解政治场域中的权力运作和民意表达。I’m particularly intrigued by the potential for the book to offer a new lens through which to examine power dynamics within contentious politics. Silence, in many contexts, can be a powerful tool of oppression, used to marginalize and disempower dissenting voices. Conversely, it can also be a strategic weapon, employed by the disenfranchised to conserve energy, avoid retribution, or build momentum for future action. The interplay between these two facets of silence, and its relationship with vocalization, is a critical area of study. I hope the book provides a robust theoretical framework for understanding these complex interactions. Furthermore, the term "contentious politics" suggests that the book will likely engage with moments of overt conflict and social unrest. In such situations, the decision to speak or to remain silent can have profound consequences. I’m eager to see how the author analyzes the factors that influence these decisions, and the subsequent impact on the trajectory of political movements. Does the book offer case studies that illustrate the diverse ways in which silence and voice manifest in different political contexts? I would be particularly interested in examples from non-Western societies, where the cultural and political landscapes surrounding expression and suppression might differ significantly from those typically studied in the Western canon. This would undoubtedly enrich the book's analytical scope and offer valuable comparative insights. The promise of a deeper understanding of the nuances of political participation, beyond the readily observable, is what draws me to this title.
评分《沉默与发声:论断政治研究中的声音与沉默》这个书名,给我一种“听见未被听见的声音”的强烈暗示。在政治学的研究范畴内,我们习惯于捕捉那些清晰、响亮、具有动员力的“声音”,例如公开的抗议、政治辩论、媒体报道等。然而,正如这个书名所揭示的,沉默并非总是意味着不存在,它可能是一种更深层次的、更复杂的政治现象,蕴含着被压抑的诉求、策略性的等待,甚至是集体性的抗拒。我非常期待这本书能够深入剖析“沉默”在断政治中的多重意涵。它是否是一种反抗的策略,一种在特定权力结构下,为了规避直接冲突、保存实力而采取的“不发声”?它是否是在缺乏话语权或组织能力时,个体和群体被动“噤声”的体现?抑或是,它是一种对主流话语的消极抵制,一种“无声的拒绝”?更进一步,“断政治”这个关键词,预示着本书将聚焦于那些充满争议、冲突和动荡的政治时刻。我好奇的是,作者将如何解释“声音”的出现如何打破“沉默”,以及“沉默”的存在又如何影响“声音”的塑造和传播。是声音的力量终将驱散沉默的阴影,还是沉默本身蕴含着一种颠覆性的力量,能够以一种更为持久的方式改变政治格局?我希望书中能提供一些具有启发性的理论框架和扎实的案例分析,来帮助我理解沉默与发声之间错综复杂的关系,以及它们在断政治进程中的关键作用。The title, "Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics," immediately suggests a departure from traditional scholarship that often prioritizes overt forms of political action. I am particularly drawn to the idea that silence itself can be a significant factor in contentious politics, rather than merely an absence of activity. I anticipate that the book will explore the various reasons behind silence, ranging from strategic calculation and fear of reprisal to the complete lack of avenues for expression. The concept of "contentious politics" implies situations of conflict and struggle, and I am eager to understand how the interplay between vocalization and silence shapes the dynamics of these events. Will the author distinguish between different types of silence, such as imposed silence versus chosen silence? Furthermore, how does the emergence of voice interact with existing silences? Does the amplification of certain voices necessarily lead to the marginalization or silencing of others? I am keen to see if the book provides empirical examples that illustrate these complex relationships, perhaps by examining historical or contemporary political movements. The title also implies a critical engagement with power structures, as silence can be a tool of oppression, while voice can be a means of liberation. I hope the book delves into these power dynamics and offers insights into how they are negotiated within the context of contentious politics. The promise of uncovering the hidden narratives and unspoken sentiments that underpin political transformations is a compelling one.
评分这本书的名字《沉默与发声:论断政治研究中的声音与沉默》从一开始就抓住了我的注意力。政治学领域充斥着各种对事件、运动和权力结构的分析,但“沉默”这个视角,却常常被忽略,或者只是被当作一种缺乏信息的表象。然而,正如这本书的标题所暗示的,沉默本身可能蕴含着丰富的信息,是一种积极的抗争形式,或者是一种被压迫的体现。我非常期待这本书能深入探讨,在那些看起来风平浪静的政治场域下,究竟隐藏着多少未被听见的声音,又是什么构成了这种沉默?是通过审查、恐惧,还是精心策划的社会工程?更进一步,作者是否会探讨,当沉默被打破,声音出现时,它又将如何影响政治的走向?是会引发一场革命,还是仅仅是一次短暂的涟漪?书中对于“断政治”(contentious politics)的界定和分析,也让我颇为好奇。这个概念本身就带有冲突和争议的意味,而在这其中,声音与沉默的互动,无疑是构成其动态轨迹的关键要素。我猜想,作者可能不仅仅是简单地描绘现象,而是会尝试构建一个理论框架,来解释沉默和发声在断政治中的作用机制,以及它们之间复杂的辩证关系。是声音必然会战胜沉默,还是沉默能以另一种更持久的方式改变政治格局?我迫不及待想知道书中给出的答案。Furthermore, I'm keen to explore how the author defines and operationalizes "voice" and "silence" within the context of contentious politics. Are we talking about overt protests and public speeches, or subtler forms of dissent and resistance? Similarly, what constitutes "silence"? Is it the absence of public dissent, or perhaps a more active suppression of voices? The book's title suggests a nuanced approach, and I anticipate a detailed exploration of these concepts. I'm particularly interested in the methodological challenges involved in studying silence. How does one empirically capture and analyze that which is intentionally or unintentionally absent? Does it involve historical analysis of suppressed narratives, ethnographic studies of marginalized communities, or perhaps computational analysis of linguistic patterns that reveal underlying sentiments? The very act of studying silence implies a certain paradox, and I'm eager to see how the author navigates this. The "contentious politics" aspect also promises a rich vein of analysis. This field, by its nature, deals with moments of social upheaval and political contestation. Understanding the role of both vocalization and its antithesis in these critical junctures is paramount to a comprehensive understanding of social change. I hope the book delves into specific case studies that illustrate these dynamics, providing concrete examples that bring theoretical concepts to life.
评分《沉默与发声:论断政治研究中的声音与沉默》这个书名,让我第一时间联想到的是那些被淹没的、不为人知的故事。在宏大的历史叙事和激烈的政治斗争中,我们往往习惯于聚焦于那些勇敢站出来、发出呐喊的个体和群体,将他们视为推动历史进程的英雄。然而,更多的时候,政治的脉络和力量的消长,并非仅仅由声音的大小决定,沉默的力量同样不容小觑。我期待这本书能够深入挖掘“沉默”在断政治研究中的多重含义和功能。它可能是一种策略性的退却,为保存力量、积蓄能量,等待更合适的时机;它也可能是在压迫下无法发声的困境,是权利被剥夺的集体悲鸣;甚至,它可能是一种有意识的抵制,是对主流叙事的消极回应。作者如何界定和分析这些不同形态的“沉默”,是这本书最让我好奇的部分。同时,“断政治”这个词汇,暗示了本书将探讨的不仅仅是和平时期的政治博弈,而是那些充满张力、冲突和不确定性的时刻。在这些时刻,声音的出现与沉默的存在,往往是塑造事件走向、影响权力格局的关键。我希望能在这本书中看到,作者如何论证声音的“发出”与沉默的“存在”之间,是如何相互作用、相互影响的。是声音能够冲破沉默,还是沉默能够吞噬声音?或者,两者之间存在着一种更为复杂、动态的平衡?我期待这本书能提供一些具体的案例研究,来佐证其理论分析,让我能够更直观地理解沉默在断政治中的具体表现和潜在影响。The title, "Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics," immediately sparks my curiosity about the author's approach to dissecting what constitutes "voice" in the context of political dissent. While overt demonstrations and public pronouncements are readily identifiable as forms of vocalization, I anticipate the book will explore subtler, perhaps less obvious, manifestations of dissent. Does "voice" encompass everyday acts of resistance, acts of non-compliance in bureaucratic systems, or the creation of alternative cultural narratives that challenge dominant ideologies? Moreover, the book's focus on "contentious politics" suggests an examination of situations marked by conflict and contestation. In such environments, the decision to amplify one's voice or to remain silent can be fraught with risk and strategic calculation. I am particularly interested in how the author differentiates between voluntary and involuntary silence. Is silence a chosen tactic, a deliberate withholding of expression for strategic purposes, or is it a symptom of systemic oppression, where individuals and groups are systematically denied the means to express themselves? The potential for the book to illuminate the power dynamics inherent in the creation and suppression of voice is immense. I hope the author provides insightful analysis on how dominant groups leverage silence to maintain control, and how marginalized groups attempt to break through this silence to assert their agency. The book's title promises a deep dive into the often-overlooked aspects of political engagement, and I look forward to a rigorous and nuanced exploration of these critical concepts, potentially through compelling case studies that illustrate the multifaceted nature of voice and silence in shaping political outcomes.
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有