In fact, the gap between the ideology of the Reich and its actual character was enormous. But under the spell of the mirage, the will to resist was undermined by an accelerating process of social disintegration.
avid Schoenbaum (born 1935, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) is an American social scientist and historian.
He was teaching as a professor of History at the University of Iowa until 2008. Schoenbaum received his BA at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. In 1965, he was awarded a D.Phil at Oxford University.
Schoenbaum is best known for his 1966 social history book, Hitler’s Social Revolution, where Schoenbaum challenged the then prevailing notion that the National Socialist regime was a backwards looking, reactionary anti-modernizing dictatorship, and instead argued that, in effect at least, the Nazi regime was a modernizing dictatorship.[1] Schoenbaum argued that the Nazi revolution was a "double revolution...of means and ends".[1] In order to accomplish its foreign policy goals, namely war, the Nazi regime was forced to encourage modernization and industrialization, despite the anti-modernist nature of Nazi ideology.[1] Schoenbaum wrote that "The revolution of ends was ideological—war against bourgeois and industrial society. The revolution of means was its reciprocal. It was bourgeois and industrial since in a industrial age, even a war against industrial society must be fought with industrial means and bourgeois are necessary to fight the bourgeoise".[2]
In Schoenbaum's view, there were two sorts of social realities, namely "objective" and "interpreted social reality".[3] By "objective social reality", Schoenbaum argued the Nazi regime had achieved greater degree of industrialization and urbanization, while by "interpreted social reality", the Nazi regime was able to break down the traditional lines of class, religion and regional loyalties to achieve an unparalleled degree of unity amongst the German people.[3] In particular, Schoenbaum argued that the Nazi regime was able to destroy the traditional class barriers that had divided German society, and for most Germans, the increased social mobility offered by the Nazi regime was sufficient compensation for the destruction of democracy.[3] Schoenbaum's book proved to be highly influential, and set off an important debate about both the intentions and the effects of Nazi social policies, and the nature of social change during the Nazi period.[4] Some historians such as Ian Kershaw have criticized Schoenbaum's work for placing too much reliance on what Kershaw considers to be subjective and impressionistic evidence.[5]
Schoenbaum has written books about other aspects of modern German history. In 1968, Schoenbaum published a book about the Spiegel Affair scandal of 1962, in which he sought to set the affair into the context of the history of the Federal Republic and the wider context of German history. His 1982 book Zabern 1913 concerned the political fall-out from the Saverne Affair in 1913. Schoenbaum argued that the affair revealed different aspects of the Second Reich, and argued that the Zabern Affair was the exception that proved that the rule that the Second Reich was no more or less liberal or illiberal then other Western nations.[6] In 1996, Schoenbaum wrote a highly critical book review in the National Review of Daniel Goldhagen's bestseller Hitler's Willing Executioners where he charged Goldhagen with grossly simplifying the question of the degree and virulence of German Antisemitism, and of only selecting evidence that supported his thesis.[7] Furthermore, Schoenbaum complained that Goldhagen did not take a comparative approach with Germany placed in isolation, thereby falsely implying that Germans and Germans alone were the only nation that saw widespread anti-semitism.[8] Finally, Schoenbaum argued that Goldhagen failed to explain why the anti-Jewish boycott of April 1, 1933 was relatively ineffective or why the Kristallnacht needed to be organized by the Nazis as opposed to being a spontaneous expression of German popular anti-semitism.[9] Using an example from his family history, Schoenbaum wrote that his mother-in-law, a Polish Jew who lived in Germany between 1928–1947, never considered the National Socialists and the Germans synonymous, and expressed regret that Goldhagen could not see the same.[9]
One of Schoenbaum's few works outside of German history is The United States And The State of Israel, a diplomatic history of relations between Israel and the United States from 1948 to 1993.
评分
评分
评分
评分
坦白说,初拿到这本书时,我对它的期待是相当审慎的,毕竟涉及那个敏感时期的学术作品汗牛充栋,要从中脱颖而出需要极高的智慧和勇气。然而,这本书的结构设计,特别是其对‘革命’这一概念的重新界定,彻底颠覆了我原有的认知框架。作者并未将焦点局限于政治权力的更迭,而是将目光投向了更深层的文化基因和意识形态的重塑过程。书中对于知识分子群体内部的分裂与合流的分析尤为精妙,那种思想上的拉扯、信仰上的动摇,被刻画得入木三分,展现了精英阶层在面对时代巨变时,其复杂而矛盾的心态。我特别欣赏作者在处理复杂概念时所展现出的那种克制与精准,每一个论断都像经过无数次打磨的钻石,闪烁着冷静而锐利的光芒。它不像某些流行的历史读物那样追求戏剧性的冲突,而是沉静地铺陈着历史的肌理,让人在不知不觉中被其严谨的逻辑链条所折服。读完后,你不会感到情绪上的宣泄,而是一种知识结构被彻底梳理后的清明感。
评分我发现这本书的价值,很大程度上体现在其对‘被遗忘者’的记录和发掘上。通常的历史叙事往往聚焦于那些站在舞台中央的人物,但这本书却花了大量的篇幅,去描绘那些在宏大叙事背景下被边缘化或被集体记忆所清洗掉的声音和群体。例如,书中对特定地域手工业者在工业化冲击下的生存状态的描述,那种缓慢的、带着绝望的挣扎,被作者捕捉得极其到位,充满了令人动容的细节。这种对‘微观历史’的关注,极大地丰富了我们对那个转型期社会全貌的理解。它不再是教科书上那种扁平化的图景,而是充满了细密纹理和复杂人性的立体世界。这种对细节的执着,需要作者具备极大的耐心和卓越的信息整合能力,而这本书恰恰在这两方面都表现得非常出色。它提醒我们,每一次重大的社会变迁,背后都是无数普通个体艰难的日常构建与瓦解。
评分这本书的叙事视角着实令人耳目一新,作者仿佛能穿梭时空,以一种近乎沉浸式的体验,带领我们深入探究了二十世纪上半叶欧洲社会结构变迁的底层逻辑。书中对那些看似微不足道的社会风俗、日常生活的细枝末节进行了极其细致的描摹,从市民阶层的焦虑转向工人阶级的觉醒,其间微妙的心理转折和群体情绪的积累,被描绘得淋漓尽致。尤其是关于技术进步与传统价值观冲突的那几个章节,作者没有采取宏大叙事的说教腔调,而是通过具体的人物故事和生活片段,展现了新旧秩序交替时期的那种无所适从与躁动不安。阅读过程中,我时常感觉自己不再是一个旁观者,而是那个身处变动洪流中的一员,呼吸着那个时代特有的压抑与希望交织的空气。作者对社会心理学有着深刻的洞察力,使得书中关于群体心态演变的部分,具有极强的说服力和感染力,绝非空泛的理论堆砌,而是建立在对大量历史资料细致梳理之上的艺术再现。这种以小见大的叙事策略,极大地增强了作品的文学性和思想深度,让人在阅读的过程中不断进行自我反思。
评分这本书的文本语言运用达到了近乎古典文学的精致程度,每一个句子的节奏感和韵律感都经过了深思熟虑,使得即便是涉及晦涩的社会学理论,读起来也丝毫没有枯燥之感。作者似乎是一位深谙文学修辞的大师,他擅长使用对比和隐喻,将抽象的社会力量具象化,比如他对‘集体身份’构建过程中那种隐秘的、近乎宗教狂热的仪式感的描写,简直让人不寒而栗,却又不得不承认其描写的真实性。不同于许多西方史学著作常常流露出的那种居高临下的批判姿态,这本书展现出一种罕见的、近乎悲悯的同理心,它试图去理解,而不是简单地审判那个时代人们的选择。这种对‘理解’的执着追求,使得阅读体验变得格外充实和富有挑战性。它迫使读者放下既有的道德标尺,去探究在特定的历史压力下,人类社会是如何一步步滑向或走向其既定目标的。对于语言艺术有较高要求的读者,这本书无疑是一场盛宴。
评分这本书最让我感到震撼的,是其对‘时间感’的操控艺术。作者巧妙地在不同时间尺度之间来回穿梭,时而拉远镜头,展现数十年间社会思潮的缓慢渗透,时而又聚焦于某个特定年份、甚至某一两周内的关键事件,揭示其背后积蓄已久的力量是如何瞬间爆发的。这种节奏的错落有致,使得全书的张力始终保持在一个高水平线上,阅读过程几乎没有喘息的机会。它成功地营造了一种强烈的宿命感,仿佛历史的走向是不可避免的,但同时又在强调个体选择在关键节点上的决定性作用,这种辩证的处理手法非常高明。尤其是在论述意识形态渗透如何从涓涓细流汇聚成不可阻挡的洪流时,作者的分析逻辑清晰,层层递进,让人不得不佩服其构建复杂论证体系的能力。这本书无疑是理解现代社会起源的一个极为深刻且多维度的切入点。
评分something of a classic
评分something of a classic
评分something of a classic
评分something of a classic
评分something of a classic
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有