Around the globe, economists affect markets by saying what markets are doing, what they should do, and what they will do. Increasingly, experimental economists are even designing real-world markets. But, despite these facts, economists are still largely thought of as scientists who merely observe markets from the outside, like astronomers look at the stars. Do Economists Make Markets? boldly challenges this view. It is the first book dedicated to the controversial question of whether economics is performative--of whether, in some cases, economics actually produces the phenomena it analyzes. The book's case studies--including financial derivatives markets, telecommunications-frequency auctions, and individual transferable quotas in fisheries--give substance to the notion of the performativity of economics in an accessible, nontechnical way. Some chapters defend the notion; others attack it vigorously. The book ends with an extended chapter in which Michel Callon, the idea's main formulator, reflects upon the debate and asks what it means to say economics is performative. The book's insights and strong claims about the ways economics is entangled with the markets it studies should interest--and provoke--economic sociologists, economists, and other social scientists. In addition to the editors and Callon, the contributors include Marie-France Garcia-Parpet, Francesco Guala, Emmanuel Didier, Philip Mirowski, Edward Nik-Khah, Petter Holm, Vincent-Antonin Lpinay, and Timothy Mitchell.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
interesting but problematic. does economic theory perform economic reality? perform or express? ANT theory applied to studies of economic theory, relation between social science and its objects, "sociotecnical agencement."
评分interesting but problematic. does economic theory perform economic reality? perform or express? ANT theory applied to studies of economic theory, relation between social science and its objects, "sociotecnical agencement."
评分还挺有意思的一个集子，正好反映了 performativity 从一个非常具体（局限）的概念向更泛化的理论的转变。不过我真没看懂 Mirowsk 和 Nik-Khah 到底对ANT这么大怨念是哪儿来的，他们提出的一切批评和 alternative 在我看来都是ANT可以囊括（并且在我看来是ANT的优点）啊……
评分还挺有意思的一个集子，正好反映了 performativity 从一个非常具体（局限）的概念向更泛化的理论的转变。不过我真没看懂 Mirowsk 和 Nik-Khah 到底对ANT这么大怨念是哪儿来的，他们提出的一切批评和 alternative 在我看来都是ANT可以囊括（并且在我看来是ANT的优点）啊……
评分interesting but problematic. does economic theory perform economic reality? perform or express? ANT theory applied to studies of economic theory, relation between social science and its objects, "sociotecnical agencement."
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有