何柔宛(Karen Ho),普林斯顿大学人类学博士,明尼苏达大学人类学系教授,研究方向为华尔街制度文化、美国企业裁员现象和新自由主义。
From Publishers Weekly
The timely question, What caused the current global financial crisis? provokes answers usually aimed at the level of institutions and the more abstract market logic. Ho's refreshing ethnography of the daily lives of Wall Street investment bankers takes another tack and outlines a web of practices, beliefs and structures that may be vital to understanding what keeps the market system in place despite built-in instabilities. Ho, a former business analyst and now an associate professor of anthropology at the University of Minnesota, unpacks constant downsizing, high risk/high reward job liquidity, shortsighted compensation structures, prestige and the ruse of shareholder value. Her keen eye for the significance of space illuminates workplace narratives, e.g., segregating staff by floor, function and prestige; constant and lavish recruiting events at Princeton and Harvard; and anticlimactically tawdry office space for most workers. The author exposes how elite undergraduates are immersed in a culture promoting finance as the only legitimate job, how educational pedigrees reinforce the financial world's self-image—while the actual jobs remain rigidly hierarchical (stratifying women, people of color and non–Ivy League graduates), highly unstable and isolating, encouraging a culture in which making money is the only value. (Aug.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Review
"We're pretty familiar with the economic rationale for the regime of cost-cutting and downsizing throughout corporate America in recent decades. But Karen Ho's research greatly enriches our understanding of how Wall Street's own peculiar culture of transient relationships and relentless competition has contributed to the shareholder revolution. And, along the way, her interviews and fieldwork offer a very revealing picture of the mind of Wall Street. A fascinating and important book." Doug Henwood, editor of Left Business Observer " Karen Ho has picked an excellent time to publish her fascinating new study...patient ethnographic analysis has produced a fascinating portrait that will be refreshingly novel to most bankers...Ho peppers her account with revealing eyewitness stories...Most fascinating of all is her account of how Wall Street becomes deluded by its own rhetoric about "market efficiency"...I, for one, would vote that Ho's account becomes mandatory reading on any MBA (or investment banking course); if nothing else, it might be more entertaining than the other texts that bankers swallow so uncritically." Gillian Tett, Financial Times, 2nd October 2009
如下 “For my daughter and son, Mira and August, in the hope that their generation will see greater socioeconomic equality.” P.S. 很有趣 一些部分八卦风气较重外, 讨论比预想中有深度 叙述显得有点絮絮叨叨
评分如果曾经在股票等二级市场上侵泡过,都会感受到,交易的核心就是人性的博弈。 此书角度其实很有趣,是一个人类学博士,进入华尔街一段时间后,写出来的对于华尔街的描述。外界对此评价很高,而我却持有不同意见。 首先本书导言部分太差,正式章节采访过多,那种就像中国财经记...
评分我没有受过社会学的专业训练,不知道从社会学专业的角度如何评价这本书。作为一个普通读者,只能说这本书挺让人失望的。 这本书花了大量篇幅反复强调投行工作时间长、薪酬水平高、流动性大这些非常显而易见的事实。问题是这些简单的事实完全可以通过统计数字做出全局性的描述,...
评分书名中的清算指的是经常跟裁员倒闭关联在一起的重组清算,不是结算Settlement。实际上这个书名跟后面副标题中的华尔街关联起来,容易让人误以为是结算。 作者是人类学博士,本书是作者在1998-1999年在华尔街工作期间和之后访问后的人类学田野报告,再加上作者对“股东价值”的...
评分教授上课要求读的
评分A not so pleasant perspective of wall street. 顺便一提,看来只要名校出身,读人类学一样可以进投行。
评分城市人类学的一个特征就是人类学家能做的东西很大程度上仰赖于个人背景和社会网络,这样一个田野对作者来说不见得有多难,但对outsider来说就是不可能完成的任务
评分读完本书可以终结最近的996讨论,也终于明白为什么Hoang会专门在自己书里单独cue这本书了。从大众利益与股东收益分离为入手点,说明市场的不稳定性通过华尔街投行自身不断重塑,而并非完全取决与市场自然波动。进而用insitutional ethnography to explain the take-for-grantedness daily practices of the investment bankers. 在美国金融市场的扩张和全球化的趋势下,华尔街模式被美国商界适用又进一步推广到亚洲和拉美,也终究造就了98,08两场金融风暴。新人招聘,办公室政治,种族关系,性别差异......除了在金融血汗工厂卖命的白领和最终受益的大股东和银行家,其他一切都是华尔街自己营造的泡沫。
评分A not so pleasant perspective of wall street. 顺便一提,看来只要名校出身,读人类学一样可以进投行。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有