Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative and International Context pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
John Jackson is Professor of Law and Dean of University College Dublin, School of Law.
Maximo Langer is Acting Professor of Law at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Peter Tillers is Professor of Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University.
This book aims to honour the work of Professor Mirjan Damaska, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School and a prominent authority for many years in the fields of comparative law, procedural law, evidence, international criminal law and Continental legal history. Professor Damaska 's work is renowned for providing new frameworks for understanding different legal traditions. To celebrate the depth and richness of his work and discuss its implications for the future, the editors have brought together an impressive range of leading scholars from different jurisdictions in the fields of comparative and international law, evidence and criminal law and procedure. Using Professor Damaska's work as a backdrop, the essays make a substantial contribution to the development of comparative law, procedure and evidence. After an introduction by the editors and a tribute by Harold Koh, Dean of Yale Law School, the book is divided into four parts. The first part considers contemporary trends in national criminal procedure, examining cross-fertilisation and the extent to which these trends are resulting in converging practices across national jurisdictions. The second part explores the epistemological environment of rules of evidence and procedure. The third part analyses human rights standards and the phenomenon of hybridisation in transnational and international criminal law. The final part of the book assesses Professor Damaska 's contribution to comparative law and the challenges faced by comparative law in the twenty first century.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
国家理念和司法官僚结构的不同组合对司法结构存在不同的影响，对抗制和审问制的一刀切区分只是片面的，本书以达马斯卡的此观点为基础点出模式可以是相似的，形成的原因各有不同。数据有点老。
评分国家理念和司法官僚结构的不同组合对司法结构存在不同的影响，对抗制和审问制的一刀切区分只是片面的，本书以达马斯卡的此观点为基础点出模式可以是相似的，形成的原因各有不同。数据有点老。
评分国家理念和司法官僚结构的不同组合对司法结构存在不同的影响，对抗制和审问制的一刀切区分只是片面的，本书以达马斯卡的此观点为基础点出模式可以是相似的，形成的原因各有不同。数据有点老。
评分国家理念和司法官僚结构的不同组合对司法结构存在不同的影响，对抗制和审问制的一刀切区分只是片面的，本书以达马斯卡的此观点为基础点出模式可以是相似的，形成的原因各有不同。数据有点老。
评分国家理念和司法官僚结构的不同组合对司法结构存在不同的影响，对抗制和审问制的一刀切区分只是片面的，本书以达马斯卡的此观点为基础点出模式可以是相似的，形成的原因各有不同。数据有点老。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有