The Supreme Court's reapportionment decisions, beginning with Baker v. Carr in 1962, had far more than jurisprudential consequences. They sparked a massive wave of extraordinary redistricting in the mid-1960s. Both state legislative and congressional districts were redrawn more comprehensively - by far - than at any previous time in America's history. Moreover, they changed what would happen at law should a state government fail to enact a new districting plan when one was legally required. This book provides a detailed analysis of how judicial partisanship affected redistricting outcomes in the 1960s, arguing that the reapportionment revolution led indirectly to three fundamental changes in the nature of congressional elections: the abrupt eradication of a 6% pro-Republican bias in the translation of congressional votes into seats outside the south; the abrupt increase in the apparent advantage of incumbents; and the abrupt alteration of the two parties' success in congressional recruitment and elections.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
gerrymander and malapportion
评分政治学的不少学生，大抵都是头脑简单，做出来的研究也非常的简单。或者他们头脑简单，却用复杂的方法掩盖他们思维上的简单。Cox却不是这样，他的思维非常慎密，完全明白用简单的语言井井有条地描述非常复杂的制度与行动。他的著作，哪怕就是用来学习英文写作，也都是范本~
评分政治学的不少学生，大抵都是头脑简单，做出来的研究也非常的简单。或者他们头脑简单，却用复杂的方法掩盖他们思维上的简单。Cox却不是这样，他的思维非常慎密，完全明白用简单的语言井井有条地描述非常复杂的制度与行动。他的著作，哪怕就是用来学习英文写作，也都是范本~
评分gerrymander and malapportion
评分gerrymander and malapportion
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有