The Supreme Court's reapportionment decisions, beginning with Baker v. Carr in 1962, had far more than jurisprudential consequences. They sparked a massive wave of extraordinary redistricting in the mid-1960s. Both state legislative and congressional districts were redrawn more comprehensively - by far - than at any previous time in America's history. Moreover, they changed what would happen at law should a state government fail to enact a new districting plan when one was legally required. This book provides a detailed analysis of how judicial partisanship affected redistricting outcomes in the 1960s, arguing that the reapportionment revolution led indirectly to three fundamental changes in the nature of congressional elections: the abrupt eradication of a 6% pro-Republican bias in the translation of congressional votes into seats outside the south; the abrupt increase in the apparent advantage of incumbents; and the abrupt alteration of the two parties' success in congressional recruitment and elections.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
gerrymander and malapportion
评分gerrymander and malapportion
评分gerrymander and malapportion
评分政治学的不少学生，大抵都是头脑简单，做出来的研究也非常的简单。或者他们头脑简单，却用复杂的方法掩盖他们思维上的简单。Cox却不是这样，他的思维非常慎密，完全明白用简单的语言井井有条地描述非常复杂的制度与行动。他的著作，哪怕就是用来学习英文写作，也都是范本~
评分政治学的不少学生，大抵都是头脑简单，做出来的研究也非常的简单。或者他们头脑简单，却用复杂的方法掩盖他们思维上的简单。Cox却不是这样，他的思维非常慎密，完全明白用简单的语言井井有条地描述非常复杂的制度与行动。他的著作，哪怕就是用来学习英文写作，也都是范本~
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有