This book represents a serious and philosophically sophisticated guide to modern American legal theory, demonstrating that legal positivism has been a misunderstood and underappreciated perspective through most of twentieth-century American legal thought. Anthony Sebok traces the roots of positivism through the first half of the twentieth century, and rejects the view that one must adopt some version of natural law theory in order to recognize moral principles in the law. On the contrary, once one corrects for the mistakes of formalism and postwar legal process, one is left with a theory of legal positivism that takes moral principles seriously while avoiding the pitfalls of natural law. The broad scope of this book ensures that it will be read by philosophers of law, historians of law, historians of American intellectual life, and those in political science concerned with public law and administration.
具体描述
读后感
Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...
评分Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...
评分Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...
评分Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...
评分Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...
用户评价
三年前只有我一个人标记，三年后还是如此。。。作者显然同情包容性实证主义，但这场争论已经快被大家遗弃。对过程学派的描述最为细致，只是将实证主义和形式主义的关系颠倒过来，反倒认为前者是更大范畴，这令人略微惊讶。
评分第六章论述弱立场自然法理论会必然走入强立场自然法理论精妙而难懂。有空再看。理论史鲜明活泼，理解形式主义与实证主义、法律实证主义和社会学实证主义之间的差别，很重要。
评分三年前只有我一个人标记，三年后还是如此。。。作者显然同情包容性实证主义，但这场争论已经快被大家遗弃。对过程学派的描述最为细致，只是将实证主义和形式主义的关系颠倒过来，反倒认为前者是更大范畴，这令人略微惊讶。
评分三年前只有我一个人标记，三年后还是如此。。。作者显然同情包容性实证主义，但这场争论已经快被大家遗弃。对过程学派的描述最为细致，只是将实证主义和形式主义的关系颠倒过来，反倒认为前者是更大范畴，这令人略微惊讶。
评分三年前只有我一个人标记，三年后还是如此。。。作者显然同情包容性实证主义，但这场争论已经快被大家遗弃。对过程学派的描述最为细致，只是将实证主义和形式主义的关系颠倒过来，反倒认为前者是更大范畴，这令人略微惊讶。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有