馬剋•裏拉(Mark Lilla),美國芝加哥大學社會思想委員會教授,歐洲思想史學者,被譽為美國自由主義陣營的一支健筆。作為公共知識分子的他在歐美具有相當的知名度和影響力,著有《G.B.維科:一個反現代者的形成》(1993),編有《新法蘭西思想:政治哲學》(1994),《伯林的遺産》(2001)。
European history of the past century is full of examples of philosophers, writers, and jurists who, whether they lived in democratic, communist, or fascist societies, supported and defended totalitarian principles and horrific regimes. But how can intellectuals, who should be alert to the evils of tyranny, betray the ideals of freedom and independent inquiry? How can they take positions that, implicitly or not, endorse oppression and human suffering on a vast scale?
In profiles of Martin Heidegger, Carl Schmitt, Walter Benjamin, Alexandre Kojeve, Michel Foucault, and Jacques Derrida, Mark Lilla demonstrates how these thinkers were so deluded by the ideologies and convulsions of their times that they closed their eyes to authoritarianism, brutality, and state terror. He shows how intellectuals who fail to master their passions can be driven into a political sphere they scarcely understand, with momentous results for our intellectual and political lives.
读完这本书后,不禁对书名《当知识分子遇到政治》产生了强烈的疑问,也许用“政治漩涡中的知识分子”这样的名字更能准确概括全书的内容。 全书为我们介绍了海德格尔、施米特、本雅明、科耶夫、福柯和德里达这样6位欧洲现代大知识分子的思想转变轨迹,其中贯穿的一条主线...
評分在考完试的一个星期以后,我终于开始看书。 昨日在陕西南路顺便逛了季风,看到一本书《当知识分子遇到政治》,从未见过有人推荐或者畅销的书。随手翻了一下,第一篇则是关于马丁·海德格尔,另外还有瓦尔特·本雅明,以及米歇尔·福柯。看到这些名字的时候,我就决定自己要买...
評分李文倩 讨论哲学的难题之一,即我们无法说清哲学到底是什么。至少到目前为止,尚没有任何一种能为大家所普遍接受的理论或定义,对哲学做出过有效而清晰的界定。而且有相当多的人认为,哲学根本是无法定义的。但毫无疑问的是,我们这种对哲学本性的追问,本身就是一种哲学思考...
評分作者是芝加哥大学社会思想委员会的教授,译者序言里也把他说得很牛。 大概上个礼拜,我从yjrg转载了一篇严搏非关于此书的书评到光华的book。 老实说,那本书评写得也不是很吸引人。 书的原名〈The Reckless Mind :Intellectuals in Politics〉汉译只有后半截。 据金山词霸的...
評分载《文汇读书周报》第9版 2010年4月9日 《当知识分子遇到政治》 [美] 马克·里拉著 邓晓菁 王笑红译 新星出版社2010年出版 很久没有读到这样的好书了,它不但给你学术上的思考,而且还给你人生的启迪,同时又给你审美的愉悦。 怎样看待学术精英,乃至大师的精神与人格...
Actually a fascinating and lucid (maybe biased? and shallow?) description of the ideas of those minds. Eerily there seems to be a “grand return” to the maxim “know thyself” (with a necessity being self-aware). Whilst reading Lure of Syracuse, one could not help but remember the life of Chu Hsi and the Chinese tradition of 得君行道。德裏達章最後幾小節有助厘清紛亂思潮。
评分very readable
评分very readable
评分Actually a fascinating and lucid (maybe biased? and shallow?) description of the ideas of those minds. Eerily there seems to be a “grand return” to the maxim “know thyself” (with a necessity being self-aware). Whilst reading Lure of Syracuse, one could not help but remember the life of Chu Hsi and the Chinese tradition of 得君行道。德裏達章最後幾小節有助厘清紛亂思潮。
评分Actually a fascinating and lucid (maybe biased? and shallow?) description of the ideas of those minds. Eerily there seems to be a “grand return” to the maxim “know thyself” (with a necessity being self-aware). Whilst reading Lure of Syracuse, one could not help but remember the life of Chu Hsi and the Chinese tradition of 得君行道。德裏達章最後幾小節有助厘清紛亂思潮。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有