It has been argued that Kant's all-consuming efforts to place autonomy at the center of philosophy have had, in the long-run, the unintended effect of leading to the widespread discrediting of philosophy and of undermining the notion of autonomy itself. The result of this 'Copernican revolution' has seemed to many commentators the de-centring, if not the self-destruction, of the autonomous self. In this major reinterpretation of Kant and the post-Kantian response to his critical philosophy, Karl Ameriks argues that such a view of Kant rests on a series of misconceptions. By providing the first systematic study of the underlying structure of the reaction to Kant's critical philosophy in the writings of Reinhold, Fichte and Hegel, Karl Ameriks challenges the presumptions that dominate popular approaches to the concept of freedom, and to the interpretation of the relation between the Enlightenment, Kant and post-Kantian thought.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
貌似偏了。總之，歷史倒退論出錯的可能性太高了。
评分貌似偏了。總之，歷史倒退論出錯的可能性太高了。
评分很可惜的是，尽管Ameriks的英文写作的文笔确实是上上乘的，但是在这本著作中他对于从Reinhold至Fichte一脉的把握几乎是完全错误的，这直接导致了他对黑格尔的研究是基于整体性误读之上的。不过说一千道一万，Ameriks好歹还是北美学界中为数不多的能够正视后康德形而上学影响的人，有总比没有强吧。
评分貌似偏了。總之，歷史倒退論出錯的可能性太高了。
评分貌似偏了。總之，歷史倒退論出錯的可能性太高了。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有