In his Critical Aesthetics and Postmodernism (Clarendon Press, 1993) Paul Crowther argued that art and aesthetic experiences have the capacity to humanize. In Art and Embodiment he develops this theme in much greater depth, arguing that art can bridge the gap between philosophy's traditional striving for generality and completeness, and the concreteness and contingency of humanity's basic relation to the world. As the key element in his theory, he proposes an ecological definition of art. His strategy involves first mapping out and analysing the logical boundaries and ontological structures of the aesthetic domain. He then considers key concepts from this analysis in the light of a tradition in Continental philosophy (notably the work of Kant, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Hegel) which -- by virtue of the philosophical significance that it assigns to art -- significantly anticipates the ecological conception. On this basis Professor Crowther is able to give a full formulation of his ecological definition. Art, in making sensible or imaginative material into symbolic form, harmonizes and conserves what is unique and what is general in human experience.The aesthetic domain answers basic needs intrinsic to self-consciousness itself, and art is the highest realization of such needs. In the creation and reception of art the embodied subject is fully at home with his or her environment.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
“Qua symbolically significant sensuous manifold, art shows that reciprocity of sensibility and reason, and the individual and the collective, which are fundamental to embodied subjectivity.” 論題很有意思，寫法完全分析，不太好看。用ontological reciprocity串瞭一遍康德海德格爾MP黑狗，但我還是覺得中間闡釋的部分和主要論題關係不大。對CJ的解釋有點隨意，為瞭往他的ontological那裏靠竟然略過analytics花大章節想說dependent art那裏顯示齣CJ的潛力....
评分“Qua symbolically significant sensuous manifold, art shows that reciprocity of sensibility and reason, and the individual and the collective, which are fundamental to embodied subjectivity.” 論題很有意思，寫法完全分析，不太好看。用ontological reciprocity串瞭一遍康德海德格爾MP黑狗，但我還是覺得中間闡釋的部分和主要論題關係不大。對CJ的解釋有點隨意，為瞭往他的ontological那裏靠竟然略過analytics花大章節想說dependent art那裏顯示齣CJ的潛力....
评分“Qua symbolically significant sensuous manifold, art shows that reciprocity of sensibility and reason, and the individual and the collective, which are fundamental to embodied subjectivity.” 論題很有意思，寫法完全分析，不太好看。用ontological reciprocity串瞭一遍康德海德格爾MP黑狗，但我還是覺得中間闡釋的部分和主要論題關係不大。對CJ的解釋有點隨意，為瞭往他的ontological那裏靠竟然略過analytics花大章節想說dependent art那裏顯示齣CJ的潛力....
评分“Qua symbolically significant sensuous manifold, art shows that reciprocity of sensibility and reason, and the individual and the collective, which are fundamental to embodied subjectivity.” 論題很有意思，寫法完全分析，不太好看。用ontological reciprocity串瞭一遍康德海德格爾MP黑狗，但我還是覺得中間闡釋的部分和主要論題關係不大。對CJ的解釋有點隨意，為瞭往他的ontological那裏靠竟然略過analytics花大章節想說dependent art那裏顯示齣CJ的潛力....
评分“Qua symbolically significant sensuous manifold, art shows that reciprocity of sensibility and reason, and the individual and the collective, which are fundamental to embodied subjectivity.” 論題很有意思，寫法完全分析，不太好看。用ontological reciprocity串瞭一遍康德海德格爾MP黑狗，但我還是覺得中間闡釋的部分和主要論題關係不大。對CJ的解釋有點隨意，為瞭往他的ontological那裏靠竟然略過analytics花大章節想說dependent art那裏顯示齣CJ的潛力....
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有