This is Jurgen Habermas's most concrete historical-sociological book and one of the key contributions to political thought in the postwar period. It will be a revelation to those who have known Habermas only through his theoretical writing to find his later interests in problems of legitimation and communication foreshadowed in this lucid study of the origins, nature, and evolution of public opinion in democratic societies.
Jürgen Habermas is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Frankfurt and Professor of Philosophy at Northwestern University. He was recently awarded the 2004 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy by the Inamori Foundation. The Kyoto Prize is an international award to honor those who have contributed significantly to the scientific, cultural, and spiritual betterment of mankind.
这本书有个严重问题是把卢梭这样的人混同于公众,把哲学混同于公众舆论。——哈贝马斯把他的哲学混同于公众舆论了? 很有趣,在这本书里碰到了许多《危险的心灵》中的人物。另外,麦考米克的“转型思想”必定是来自于哈贝马斯! 哈贝马斯,《公共领域的结构转型》,学...
评分The connections drew between different social sectors are glaringly characteristic of this book, as a sociological classic. In terms of horizontally societal sectors constructing or related to public sphere, the structural complex indicated by Habermas co...
重读本科假装读完的书系列。。。
评分将公共领域和市民社会截然分开,直接源于中世纪以来权力结构和公私关系的变迁、权力主体的变化和公共权力在社会面前呈现的面相。经济交换与消费向来是“私域”,也将市民社会定位于此(这和很多意见相左),王权(其实还有教廷权力)可谓公共权力,但封建领主族长和庄园主在许多事务上的权力和纽带、大众的交往,逐渐形成介乎两者之间公共领域,如政治意见发表(领主与自治者对王权的抗拒),文化产品交换市场(市镇),话语表达空间(沙龙等,再次对语言结构与沟通可能性敏感)。重新解读许多欧美政治与社会理论,将理想公共领域定位在17-18世纪封建王朝逐步衰落而现代国家尚未成熟之际,此后基本是国家介入公域整合意见和自我合法化权力的过程。有种暧昧乌托邦情结,似希望现代社会中大众能重新为理性所充满而充分沟通交往,柔性抗拒国家规训。
评分终于读完了,待会儿写个小读书笔记吧。
评分should have read it sooner!
评分理想主义的Habermas啊,大部分情况下辩证地梳理了资本主义社会公共领域和私人领域的转型,which is inevitable,强调critical-rational debate及其consensus,时刻提防权力机构的侵犯和公共舆论的假象。他真的希望所有人都可以做到critical,也真的相信有这样的未来?不过对high art和film的critique太操之过急,对Mill的解读太极端感觉完全忽视On Liberty第二章,对现代建筑变化对转型的影响更是不知道哪儿来的source
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有