Introduction by Mohsen Mostafavi<br /> <br /> <br /> The late Robin Evans (1944-1993) was a highly original historian of architecture whose writings covered a wide range of concerns: society's role in the evolution and development of building types, aspects of geometry, modes of projection, military architecture, representation of all kinds. No matter what the topic, however, he always drew on firsthand experience, arriving at his insights from direct observation.<br /> <br /> This book brings together eight of Evans's most significant essays. Written over a period of twenty years, from 1970, when he graduated from the Architectural Association, to 1990, they represent the diverse interests of an agile and skeptical mind. The book includes an introduction by Mohsen Mostafavi, a chronological account of the development of Evans's writing by Robin Middleton, and a bibliography by Richard Difford.
有一段关于‘建筑绘图’和‘建造’的妙语。 ... drawings can never describe the fullness of the future occupation of space, they are, […], radically reductive’. It may be the architect’s major tool, but remains mute to the outsider. ‘ As Robin Evans argu...
評分有一段关于‘建筑绘图’和‘建造’的妙语。 ... drawings can never describe the fullness of the future occupation of space, they are, […], radically reductive’. It may be the architect’s major tool, but remains mute to the outsider. ‘ As Robin Evans argu...
評分有一段关于‘建筑绘图’和‘建造’的妙语。 ... drawings can never describe the fullness of the future occupation of space, they are, […], radically reductive’. It may be the architect’s major tool, but remains mute to the outsider. ‘ As Robin Evans argu...
評分有一段关于‘建筑绘图’和‘建造’的妙语。 ... drawings can never describe the fullness of the future occupation of space, they are, […], radically reductive’. It may be the architect’s major tool, but remains mute to the outsider. ‘ As Robin Evans argu...
評分有一段关于‘建筑绘图’和‘建造’的妙语。 ... drawings can never describe the fullness of the future occupation of space, they are, […], radically reductive’. It may be the architect’s major tool, but remains mute to the outsider. ‘ As Robin Evans argu...
本學期最有意思的reading沒有之一!Evans這個人真心有意思~感謝stan allen俺來普頓聽過的最好的lecturer~
评分。。。。伊文思晚期寫作實踐的一個側麵就是對繪畫角色的研究。他的論文,“從繪圖到建築的翻譯”展示瞭一種在研究上從把繪畫當成一種思考手段到把繪圖當成一種想象手段的轉移。這裏,吸引著伊文思的仍然是建築師對於繪圖的使用,與藝術傢對於繪圖的使用之間的差彆。他注意到,藝術傢們在紙上(或者其它材料上)的創作會成為最終的作品——成為圖畫或是雕塑本身,而建築師的繪圖是麵嚮建造行為的一種翻譯的工具。如他所言,“在建築形式的發展中,繪圖的闖入式角色(intrusive role)”變成瞭伊文思研究的焦點,並造就瞭《投射性模式》
评分關於project 和draw 等等 等等
评分關於mies的部分很精彩
评分。。。。伊文思晚期寫作實踐的一個側麵就是對繪畫角色的研究。他的論文,“從繪圖到建築的翻譯”展示瞭一種在研究上從把繪畫當成一種思考手段到把繪圖當成一種想象手段的轉移。這裏,吸引著伊文思的仍然是建築師對於繪圖的使用,與藝術傢對於繪圖的使用之間的差彆。他注意到,藝術傢們在紙上(或者其它材料上)的創作會成為最終的作品——成為圖畫或是雕塑本身,而建築師的繪圖是麵嚮建造行為的一種翻譯的工具。如他所言,“在建築形式的發展中,繪圖的闖入式角色(intrusive role)”變成瞭伊文思研究的焦點,並造就瞭《投射性模式》
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有