Dedicated as few men have been to the life of reason, Bertrand Russell has always been concerned with the basic questions to which religion also addresses itself -- questions about man's place in the universe and the nature of the good life, questions that involve life after death, morality, freedom, education, and sexual ethics. He brings to his treatment of these questions the same courage, scrupulous logic, and lofty wisdom for which his other work as philosopher, writer, and teacher has been famous. These qualities make the essays included in this book perhaps the most graceful and moving presentation of the freethinker's position since the days of Hume and Voltaire. "I am as firmly convinced that religions do harm as I am that they are untrue," Russell declares in his Preface, and his reasoned opposition to any system or dogma which he feels may shackle man's mind runs through all the essays in this book, whether they were written as early as 1899 or as late as 1954. The book has been edited, with Lord Russell's full approval and cooperation, by Professor Paul Edwards of the Philosophy Department of New York University. In an Appendix, Professor Edwards contributes a full account of the highly controversial "Bertrand Russell Case" of 1940, in which Russell was judicially declared "unfit" to teach philosophy at the College of the City of New York. Whether the reader shares or rejects Bertrand Russell's views, he will find this book an invigorating challenge to set notions, a masterly statement of a philosophical position, and a pure joy to read.
勃特兰·罗素
勃特兰·罗素的小册子为什么我不是基督徒是对不可知论信条的经典阐述。 这本同名小书是基于他1927年发表的演说。文章首先简单阐述罗素反对有神论论据,然后详细论述其对基督教教义之道德反对。最后他更呼吁他的读者要用“无惧的态度和开放的智慧”“独立自主、公平正直地看世界”。 在罗素后来的小册子我是一个无神论者或者不可知论吗?(副标题: 对面对新教条所持容忍态度的辩论)中, 他确认,他在哲学意义上是一个不可知论者,不知道神是否真的存在。然而在同一部作品中,他也接纳,无神论者这一称呼能更加好的表达非哲学追随者的宗教姿态。
这本书是罗素对于基督教的书写的集合,书名来自于第一篇文章,是罗素做过的一个演讲。这一个演讲确实使人读了之后有种酣畅淋漓之感,仿佛宗教徒宣称的各种信心和见证,神秘主义的把戏,对“神圣权威”的玩弄和利用,迂腐愚昧的教条,在罗素鲜明有力的思想和语言的光照之下,完...
评分罗素的论文集《为什么我不是基督教徒》在82年就已由商务印书馆在国内出版,时隔30年,商务印书馆将这册论文集列入汉译世界学术名著丛书再版。遗憾的是本书仅是罗素关于神学问题的一些讨论的论文的合辑,而不是一部系统阐述其神学思想的专著,因此从中所窥得的,也许和一个真正...
评分维特根斯坦的《对基督宗教的沉思》,和罗素的基督教批判形成了很好的对比。罗素风度翩翩、头脑睿智、站在大门外四平八稳地对门内的事物指指点点,而维特根斯坦经历了人生通彻的体验,他由此看到了信仰的动人之处。罗素是正确的,而维特根斯坦是深刻的。罗素甘愿成为一个爱智者...
评分罗素1957年写得这本书,理智有余,关怀不足吧。宗教的存在恐怕不是现有科学工具可以全面分析的。 不过西方哲学、科学推翻一切,重头质疑的精神是我们所没有的。 护短、保守的维护一切“传统”趋向的反面,恰恰是文明的自卑和桎梏。 一本好的思想工具书,一家之言,可以不接受它...
评分一直很喜欢罗素这个小老头。风趣幽默,一针见血。选择信仰宗教也许是一件更轻松的事情,但这个可爱又倔强的小老头就是要坚持自己的理性。这本书是和C.S. 路易斯的《返璞归真》对照读的,两本书同样讲到了神性,宗教的精神体验,以及宗教的作用和地位。相比起“传教士”的心灵鸡...
某天上课老师提到,不过我是暑假读的。。
评分i just read"Why I Am Not A Christian".i like the point"Fear, the Foundation of Religion".
评分That star is for the powerful language (which I really really like :)
评分Clear and sensible as Russell, no stunning opinions or sentences were served.
评分科学而理性的看待生命的无意义难道不是一种回避么?
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有