Is there really a God? Or does God exist only in our heads? Is the Bible truly God’s Word, or a jumble of fanciful myths? THE WORLD'S BEST-SELLING BOOK ON ATHEISM is your front-row ticket to mankind’s most enthralling debate. An atheist for thirty years, David Mills argues that God is unnecessary to explain the universe and life’s diversity, organization and beauty.
This unique and captivating book rebuts every argument ever offered to "prove" God’s existence and the Bible’s credibility — arguments from logic, common sense, Christian apologetics, philosophy, ethics, history, and up-to-the-minute science.
Among the intriguing questions addressed in this all-inclusive volume:
* What, precisely, is atheism, and why is it misunderstood so thoroughly?
* If God is a myth, then did the universe appear from nothing?
* Does the meticulous clockwork of planetary motion result from mindless random forces?
* Do atheists believe that human beings evolved through blind accident from lifeless matter?
* Do the splendor and intricacy of life on Earth reveal evidence of intelligent design by a supernatural Creator?
* Can atheists prove that God does NOT exist?
* What about Creation Science, and the popular new movement to reconcile Scripture and science?
* Have recent scientific discoveries pointed to God’s governance of the cosmos?
* Did Albert Einstein believe in God?
* Does the fact that energy cannot be destroyed lend credibility to a belief in eternal life?
* Without God, can there be a valid system of ethics or an objective "right" and "wrong"?
* Does religion encourage moral conduct and civilized behavior? Is the Golden Rule really such a bad idea?
* What is the meaning of life without God?
* When we die, are we simply dead like dogs?
* Did atheists suffer a trauma in childhood that warped them into blasphemous rebellion?
* Because of ubiquitous injustice on Earth, is an afterlife required to redress the imbalance, where evil is ultimately punished and virtue rewarded?
* Is atheism just another crackpot religion?
* What’s the harm in a person’s private spirituality? Does humanity have everything to gain, and nothing to lose, through belief in God (even if He’s only imaginary)?
* Apart from the Bible, is there secular historical evidence of Jesus’ miracles and resurrection?
* How do atheists explain "near death" experiences and medical miracles which amaze even skeptical doctors?
* Why should a tiny minority of atheists be able to force their opinions on everyone else by banning prayer in public schools?
* Since "there are no atheists in foxholes," have famous nonbelievers recanted on their deathbeds?
* Did Old and New Testament prophecies correctly predict events which actually unfolded during our own lifetimes?
* What about the Shroud of Turin and the discovery of wood fragments from Noah’s Ark on Mount Ararat in Turkey?
* Does the Law of Entropy (or the "running down" of the universe) contradict evolutionary theory, which asserts that Nature’s complexity is increasing?
* Is there absolute proof that man evolved from a lower form of life?
* Even if you believe that all life evolved from a single cell, how could complex cellular life originate without a Creator?
* Is atheism a totally negative philosophy, leading only to cynicism and despair?
* Does communism’s past embrace of atheism prove that atheism is an evil and failed philosophy?
* Was America really founded upon Christian principles by Christian believers?
* What is the true, behind-the-scenes relationship between politics and religion in 21st-century America?
All of these questions — and hundreds of others — are fully confronted and methodically answered in the riveting pages of Atheist Universe. It’s all here for you in one richly entertaining, comprehensive, and easy-to-read volume. Few other books provide such spellbinding inquiry and arrive at such a controversial and well-documented conclusion.
JUST UPDATED FOR 2006!
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的行文节奏掌握得非常出色,如同马拉松赛跑,起步平缓,中间段落层层加速,直到最后的冲刺段落将所有线索汇集起来,形成一个令人信服的整体结构。作者在叙事中大量采用了类比和反问的手法,这极大地增强了代入感,让人感觉自己不是在被动接受信息,而是在与作者进行一场激烈的辩论。我特别欣赏作者对“知识的局限性”这一主题的处理,他没有将科学知识神圣化,而是将其置于一个不断自我修正的动态过程中。书中关于“何为可证伪性”的讨论,结合了波普尔的观点,但又加入了对当代复杂系统理论的考量,形成了一种非常具有前瞻性的论述。与市面上许多试图提供“新信仰”的书籍不同,这本书的贡献在于它坦诚地展示了“没有终极锚点”的现实,并鼓励读者拥抱这种开放性。对于那些希望在快速变化的现实中保持心智敏锐的实践者而言,这本书提供了必要的哲学韧性。
评分我尝试用一种比较社会学的视角来解读这本书的深层影响,发现它简直就是一本对当代西方文化“去魅”过程的深度剖析报告。作者的厉害之处在于,他没有停留在纯粹的本体论讨论,而是将这些抽象的思辨牢牢地锚定在诸如信息茧房、后真相时代这类具体的社会现象上。他敏锐地指出,许多人对“确定性”的执着,并非源于虔诚,而是一种在信息爆炸时代为求生存而产生的认知防御机制。整本书的语调是克制的,但字里行间透露出的对人类心智局限性的深刻洞察,令人不寒而栗。我喜欢他讨论“共识的脆弱性”那一章,他通过历史案例的快速剪辑,展示了社群信仰是如何在微小的逻辑裂缝中分崩离析的。这本书就像一个精妙的钟表匠的作品,他拆解了构成我们世界观的每一个齿轮,展示了它们是如何啮合,又是如何在缺乏外部动力源时逐渐停摆的。它不是要你抛弃一切,而是让你理解你所持有的“一切”究竟是如何被制造出来的。
评分读完这本书,我的脑海里挥之不去的是那种强烈的、近乎于文学性的震撼感。它不像一本纯粹的学术专著,倒更像是一部史诗,只不过它的战场不是疆场,而是人类心智的荒原。作者运用了一种非常古典和富有韵律感的散文风格,使得即便是讨论诸如“第一因”这样的老生常谈,读起来也充满了戏剧张力。尤其是在描述人类对确定性的本能需求与宇宙随机性的冷酷现实之间的张力时,作者的遣词造句达到了近乎诗意的境界,让人不禁联想到尼采晚期的喃喃自语。我发现自己常常在不同章节之间来回翻阅,不是为了查找引用,而是为了重温那些措辞精准、掷地有声的段落。这本书的价值不在于它给出了一个标准答案——事实上,它清晰地表明了“标准答案”的谬误——而在于它提供了一套极其精密的工具箱,用以拆解我们自以为是的认知结构。它挑战的不是信仰本身,而是信仰的惰性。如果你期望从头到尾得到安慰,你可能会失望;但如果你渴望一场彻底的智力洗礼,这本书绝对不容错过。
评分这本书的阅读体验,用一个词来概括就是“清醒的疲惫”。作者在逻辑推演上的严谨达到了近乎偏执的程度,几乎没有留下任何可以侥幸溜过去的模糊地带。他似乎铁了心地要把读者带到一个没有庇护所的悬崖边上,然后要求你自行寻找下一步的立足点。我特别注意到了书中对“经验主义与理性主义的融合”这一块的处理,这是许多当代哲学家感到棘手的地方。作者没有试图将两者强行捏合,而是清晰地勾勒出了它们各自的边界,并解释了为什么在缺乏超验支撑的语境下,这种边界的清晰化是重建伦理学基础的第一步。这种务实到近乎冷酷的分析,使得全书的论证链条异常坚固,几乎找不到可以被攻击的薄弱环节。然而,也正因如此,对于那些习惯于在哲学探讨中寻求情感共鸣的读者来说,可能会觉得文字过于干燥和技术化。这本书更适合那些已经完成基础哲学训练,并开始尝试构建自己完整世界观的进阶读者。它像是一台高精度的手术刀,精准地切开了旧有的认知框架。
评分这本新出的哲学探讨读物,表面上看似乎是在对某些既有信仰体系进行挑战,但实际上,它更像是一面镜子,映照出我们这个时代在面对宏大叙事瓦解时所产生的集体焦虑与重构的渴望。作者的笔触极为细腻,尤其是在论述“意义的自洽性”这一章节,他没有落入常见的虚无主义陷阱,而是巧妙地搭建了一个基于人类经验和共识构建新道德框架的蓝图。我特别欣赏他对早期理性主义思潮的重新解读,他将康德和休谟的思想放在了当代科学发现的背景下进行对比,这使得原本晦涩的理论焕发出新的生命力。全书的结构安排如同一个精心设计的迷宫,读者需要不断地跟随着作者的逻辑链条,时而深入到量子力学的哲学意涵,时而抽离出来审视社会学上的权力结构。在阅读过程中,我多次停下来,不是因为我不理解,而是因为某些论点的锐利度让我感到思维的冲击,需要时间来消化其潜藏的社会文化意涵。这本书绝非轻松的读物,它要求读者具备一定的背景知识储备,但对于那些渴望在没有神圣教条的世界里寻找立足之地的思考者来说,它提供了坚实的智力支撑和一份沉甸甸的责任感。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有