Oxford Philosophical Texts Series Editor: John Cottingham The Oxford Philosophical Texts series consists of authoritative teaching editions of canonical texts in the history of philosophy from the ancient world down to modern times. Each volume provides a clear, well laid out text together with a comprehensive introduction by a leading specialist, giving the student detailed critical guidance on the intellectual context of the work and the structure and philosophical importance of the main arguments. Endnotes are supplied which provide further commentary on the arguments and explain unfamiliar references and terminology, and a full bibliography and index are also included. The series aims to build up a definitive corpus of key texts in the Western philosophical tradition, which will form a reliable and enduring resource for students and teachers alike. David Hume's aim in writing An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (1748) was to introduce his philosophy to a European culture in which many educated people read original works of philosophy. He gives an elegant and accessible presentation of strikingly original and challenging views about the limited powers of human understanding, the attractions of scepticism, the compatibility of free will and determinism, and weaknesses in the foundations of religion. Hume's philosophy was highly controversial in the eighteenth century and remains so today. The text printed in this edition is that of the Clarendon critical edition of Hume's works. A substantial introduction by the editor explains the intellectual background to the work and surveys its main themes. The volume also includes detailed explanatory notes on the text, a glossary of terms, a full list of references, and a section of supplementary readings.
有些问题,我们可以不去了解,那不会影响我们的吃喝住行。但这些问题如果不去了解,人生到底还是会变得黯淡。太多的理所当然太多的习以为常,基于习惯和经验,人变得倨傲和自负。 于是休谟问题就震撼了整个世界。科学并不比迷信更加理性。当人类掌握更多的知识,不断推进理智...
评分有人说,休谟主要的贡献在于对因果关系和归纳法的怀疑上,对于人性的理论就显得平淡无奇。这里无非是指观念和印象的划分。其实,全书是一个逻辑严密的演绎体系,而观念与印象的划分起到的就是笛卡尔“我思故我在”的逻辑起点的作用。 即使在心理学积淀空前丰富的今天,...
评分休谟的这本书我主要关心他如何考虑了人的知识形成。其他关于自由以及神迹部分不感兴趣。 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 考察对象 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 考虑两类研究对象:第一是观念的关系,第二是实际的事情。前者是纯粹靠人的思考就可以进行。最典型的是数...
评分休谟家世背景优越,他自言道,他的家世不论在父系方面或母系方面都是名门。我父亲的家属是何谟伯爵,或休谟伯爵家属的一支;至于我的祖先们,则历代以来曾经领有过我兄弟所领有的那些产业。我的母亲是发尔康诺爵士的女儿(发尔康诺是民事最高法院的院长). 对学者的批判. 他们...
评分既然想知道hume’s account of induction是否force him to account of causation,那么我们首先必须看他的论证过程: 因为归纳法不能被理性证明,所以归纳不属于理性的职能。 因为我们关于matters of fact的一切知识都是归纳得来的 又我们关于matters of fact的一切知识...
不愧是罗素推崇的大师,确实很有养分。虽然读起来甚是艰辛,但很有收获。另外这本书版本很好,一堆background info,真的很有帮助。
评分Who's your fav philosopher? I do have an answer now.
评分Who's your fav philosopher? I do have an answer now.
评分A popular version of Book 1 of the Treatise, the arguments are clearer, and shorter~
评分A popular version of Book 1 of the Treatise, the arguments are clearer, and shorter~
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有