Penelope Fitzgerald wanted to call her 1990 novel Mistakes Made by Scientists. On the other hand, she laughingly likened it to a Harlequin doctor-nurse romance. The truth about The Gate of Angels is somewhere in between. The doctor, Fred Fairly, is indeed a young Cambridge scientist, and the nurse, Daisy Saunders, has been ejected from a London hospital. If Fred is to win her love, he must make an appropriately melodramatic sacrifice--leaving the academic sanctum of St. Angelicus, a college where all females, even pussycats, are banished ("though the starlings couldn't altogether be regulated").
Daisy, however, suffers from a very non-Harlequin malady, the sort found only in Fitzgerald: "All her life she had been at a great disadvantage in finding it so much more easy to give than to take. Hating to see anyone in want, she would part without a thought with money or possessions, but she could accept only with the caution of a half-tamed animal." Self-protection is certainly not this young woman's strong suit, but we admire her endurance. At one moment, Fred points out that "women like to live on their imagination." Daisy's response? "It's all they can afford, most of them."
Set in Cambridge and London in 1912, The Gate of Angels, then, is a love story and a novel of ideas. Fred, a rector's son, has abandoned religion for observable truths, whereas the undereducated Daisy is a Christian for whom the truth is entirely relative. The novel's strengths lie in what we have come to expect from Fitzgerald: a blend of the hilarious, the out-of-kilter, and the intellectually and emotionally provocative. She confronts her characters with chaos (theoretical and magical), women's suffrage, and seemingly impossible choices, and we can by no means be assured of a happy outcome. "They looked at each other in despair, and now there seemed to be another law or regulation by which they were obliged to say to each other what they did not mean and to attack what they wished to defend."
Fitzgerald's novel also records the onslaught of the modern on traditions and beliefs it will fail to obliterate entirely: women as second-class citizens and a class-ridden society in which the poor suffer deep financial and moral humiliation. The author sees the present pleasures--Cambridge jousts in which debaters must argue not what they believe but its exact opposite--and is often charmed by them. But under the light surface, she proffers an elegant meditation on body and soul, science and imagination, choice and chance. Her characters, as ever, are originals, and even the minor players are memorable: one of Fred's fellows, the deeply incompetent Skippey, is "loved for his anxiety," because he makes others feel comparatively calm.
Fitzgerald fills all of her period novels with odd, charming, and disturbing facts and descriptions. Some, like the catalog of killing medicines Daisy administers, are strictly researched and wittily conveyed: "Over-prescriptions brought drama to the patients' tedious day. Too much antimony made them faint, too much quinine caused buzzing in the ears, too much salicylic acid brought on delirium..." Others are the product of microscopic observation, that is, imagination. Fred's family home is in hyperfertile Blow Halt, a place where no one thinks to buy vegetables, so free are they for the taking. But within this paradise, his mother and sisters are sewing banners for women's suffrage, and nature launches a quiet threat: "Twigs snapped and dropped from above, sticky threads drifted across from nowhere, there seemed to be something like an assassination, on a small scale, taking place in the tranquil heart of summer." --Kerry Fried
评分
评分
评分
评分
这部作品带给我的阅读体验是极其私密的、近乎冥想的状态。作者采用了第一人称的视角,但这种叙述又非常具有穿透性,仿佛他不仅仅是在讲述自己的故事,而是在揭示一种普遍存在于人类经验之中的某种“共鸣频率”。文字的密度很高,但得益于作者对节奏的精准把控,使得阅读的流畅性并未受到影响,反而让人愿意一字不漏地咀嚼每一个词语的重量。它探索了记忆、失落与和解的主题,但没有采用煽情的方式,而是通过对日常细节的精准捕捉,构建出一种深沉的、略带忧郁的美感。特别是书中对光影、气味等感官细节的描写,极大地增强了场景的真实感和情感的沉淀。读完后,我感到一种前所未有的平静,仿佛书中人物的挣扎与最终的释然,也成为了我内心世界的一部分。这是一种需要安静的环境才能完全体会的书,它需要你的全部注意力,而它也绝对值得你付出这份专注。
评分读完这本巨著,我最大的感受是它那股子“野”劲儿,一种不受拘束、肆意挥洒的创作激情。作者的文风极其奔放,语言中充满了未经雕琢的生命力,读起来酣畅淋漓,仿佛置身于一场盛大的、略带失控的庆典之中。叙事结构上,它采用了非线性的手法,像一张巨大的、不断扩展的思维导图,看似跳跃,实则处处埋藏着精妙的呼应和伏笔。这种阅读体验非常考验读者的专注力,但也正因如此,当那些看似零散的线索最终汇聚成一个震撼人心的整体时,带来的冲击力是无与伦比的。我尤其喜欢作者对那些边缘人物的刻画,他们没有光环,充满了缺陷,却真实得让人心痛。书中对社会现象的批判也毫不留情,带着一种近乎残忍的洞察力,直指人心深处的虚伪与恐惧。它不是一本让人读起来感到舒适的书,但绝对是一本能让你思考、让你反省、让你感到“活着”的书。那种阅读的疲惫感,混合着醍醐灌顶的爽快,真是难以言喻。
评分这本书的魅力,或许在于它那股子沉静而坚韧的力量。它的文字如同冰雪下深埋的温泉,表面平静,内里却蕴含着巨大的热量和生命力。叙事节奏掌握得极好,该舒缓时,如同一首悠扬的慢板,让人沉浸在对细节的品味中;该紧凑时,又如同骤然拉紧的弓弦,让人屏息凝神。作者的笔触极为克制,很多情绪的爆发点都处理得非常隐晦,需要读者主动去挖掘和体会,这让阅读过程变成了一场智力与情感的双重探险。我被其中关于“选择与代价”的主题深深触动。书中每一个角色似乎都在不断地面临十字路口,而他们最终的归宿,无一不是他们曾经轻描淡写或沉重承担的选择所铸就的。与其说这是一个故事,不如说这是一部关于因果律的哲学思辨,它没有给出简单的答案,只是将问题的复杂性赤裸裸地呈现在我们面前,迫使我们去面对自己的内心。
评分坦白说,我一开始是被这本书的封面吸引的,但真正让我留下来的是它那股子古怪的幽默感。这种幽默不是那种直白的笑料,而是一种建立在对荒谬现实深刻理解之上的、带着黑色底色的自嘲和讽刺。作者的语言风格非常鲜活、充满活力,夹杂着大量富有创造力的比喻和独白,读起来让人忍不住会心一笑,同时又感到一丝凉意。情节方面,它构建了一个相当奇特的微观世界,在这个世界里,日常的逻辑似乎被颠覆了,但细想之下,却又比我们习以为常的“正常”世界更加贴近真相。书中对人际关系的描绘,特别是那些充满张力却又无法割舍的依附关系,处理得既尖锐又富有同情心。阅读过程中,我时常会停下来,对着某一句妙语连珠的句子反复琢磨,那种文字带来的愉悦感是纯粹的享受。这是一本能让你在笑声中感到头皮发麻的佳作。
评分这本书的开篇就牢牢抓住了我的心,那种叙事上的张力简直让人无法呼吸。作者对人物内心世界的刻画入木三分,每一个选择、每一次犹豫都仿佛能在我眼前上演。我尤其欣赏它对于时代背景的细致描摹,那种沉浸式的体验,让我感觉自己不仅仅是在阅读一个故事,更像是在那个特定的时空里生活了一遭。情节的推进看似缓慢,实则暗流涌动,每一次翻页都伴随着对接下来发展的好奇和期待。那种细腻到令人心颤的笔触,描绘出人与人之间复杂的情感纠葛,既有温情脉脉的相互扶持,也有令人扼腕叹息的误解与疏离。书中的场景构建也极为成功,无论是宏大的历史场景还是狭小私密的内心空间,都被描绘得栩栩如生,让人仿佛能闻到空气中的气味,感受到阳光的温度。总的来说,这是一部极具深度和广度的作品,它不仅仅讲述了一个故事,更是在探讨关于人性、命运以及时间本质的深刻命题。那种读完后久久不能平复的心绪,便是对它最好的证明。
评分其实这是我读过的第一本英文小说。16年前大一的时候在学校图书馆里瞎翻出来的。当时的英文水平也就够我磕磕绊绊地读完然后明白是个爱情故事。现在重读却不得不感概我当年运气真是好,偶遇了一本关于偶遇的书,也是PF不多的结局幸福的书。PF几笔就能描出爱德华时代最好和最糟的一面,女性在争取自己的权利,但是旧道德和阶级的捆绑还是随时可以淹没个人的善良。小说本来可以有个极其戏剧性的开头,一对陌生男女被卷进了一场车祸,阴差阳错地被认成一对夫妻,还被救了他们的人安排到了同一张床上,但PF偏不这么写,我们需要先慢慢地了解床上的两个人才能知道这戏剧性的偶遇对两颗孤独的心来说有多重要。重读的意外之喜当然是发现了Dr Matthews这个角色其实是MRJames的化身,PF甚至还拿了一章来戏仿了James的鬼故事。
评分Typical Darwinian novel which contains both the crisis of faith and the salvation of romantic love
评分第三本英文原版书,这个难度有点略大,经常不知道作者到底在说什么,很薄的一本书,有的章节让我来来回回读了2,3遍,才大致明白,囧。作者的深意,我好像还说是不能很好地把握,看到十几章的时候还有点摸不着头脑,好在结局算是好的吧。。结局也看的我半天才懂
评分第三本英文原版书,这个难度有点略大,经常不知道作者到底在说什么,很薄的一本书,有的章节让我来来回回读了2,3遍,才大致明白,囧。作者的深意,我好像还说是不能很好地把握,看到十几章的时候还有点摸不着头脑,好在结局算是好的吧。。结局也看的我半天才懂
评分居然是happy ending,好感动。PF是“一见钟情主义者”咯,这本结构上略微有点斧凿痕迹,但字里行间的智性,幽默与其余几本不遑多让,作者对一对年轻主人公的人生起伏悲喜有一种俯视慈悲的视角,Daisy一如PF其它女主人公,总少了点运气,但这次作者亲自出面干涉成全化身天使守护。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有