Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli (3 May 1469 – 21 June 1527) was an Italian philosopher, writer, and politician and is considered one of the main founders of modern political science.[1] He was a diplomat, political philosopher, musician, poet and playwright, but, foremost, he was a civil servant of the Florentine Republic. In June of 1498, after the ouster and execution of Girolamo Savonarola, the Great Council elected Machiavelli as Secretary to the second Chancery of the Republic of Florence.[2]
Like Leonardo da Vinci, Machiavelli is considered a typical example of the Renaissance Man. He is most famous for a short political treatise, The Prince written 1513, but not published until 1532, five years after Machiavelli's death, the same like another work of realist political theory, the Discourses on Livy. Although he privately circulated The Prince among friends, the only work he published in his life was The Art of War, about high-military science. Since the sixteenth century, generations of politicians remain attracted and repelled by the cynical (realist) approach to power posited in The Prince, the Discourses, and the History.[3] Whatever his personal intentions, which are still debated today, his surname yielded the modern political word Machiavellianism—the use of cunning and deceitful tactics in politics or in general.
The Discourses on Livy (Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio, Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livy) is a work of political history and philosophy composed in the early 16th century by the famed Florentine public servant and political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527), best known as the author of The Prince. Where The Prince is devoted to advising the ruler of a principality, i.e., a type of monarchy, the Discourses purport to explain the structure and benefits of a republic, a form of government based on popular consent and control. It is considered almost unanimously by scholars to be if not the first, then certainly the most important, work on republicanism in the early modern period.[1] Machiavelli dedicated this work to Zanobi Buondelmonti and Cosimo Rucellai, two of the greatest exponents of the Orti Oricellari in Florence, where aristocratic young people met in order to discuss politics, art and literature.
by企鹅君 作为政治学历史上的一位巨人,马基雅维利自己的政见究竟是什么样的?他到底是君主制还是共和制的拥护者?这个问题成为了古往今来许多马基雅维利研究者争论的核心问题之一。但是我想,马基雅维利本人对于此问题可以说不甚关心。借用费耶阿本德的一句话,“什么都行(...
評分马基雅维利(公元1465年~1527年)与韩非(公元前280年~前233年)都是世界政治思想史上伟大的政治思想家。尽管他们生活的时代各异,地域不同,但他们都生活在一个社会大变革的时代。 马基雅维利生活在意大利封建割据、四分五裂、内忧外患、朝代更迭的时代。当时的意大利半岛上,有...
評分 評分【按语:马基雅维利(1469-1527)将《君主论》(1512)献给佛罗伦萨的统治者Lorenzo de’ Medici。《君主论》是《论李维》的一个分支或较小的姊妹篇。小清新,很简单。就其谋略论述而言,与亚里士多德《政治学》卷4-6差不多是异曲同工,并不更让人心惊胆战。 在区分了共和国和...
評分这部作品用大量的史实,赞颂罗马共和国的优良制度和罗马贵族、人民的德行。与近代作品相比,它不是建构在人文精神、道德的基础上,而是奠基于功利主义。马基雅维利绝不人云亦云,观察、剖析历史角度独特、深刻锐利,象一把锐利的手术刀,常有惊世骇俗观点,然而细细品味确有其...
For further readings.
评分finally...
评分補標一下去前花心思最多的書。一個吊詭的共和國,當討論德性不再古典傳統的品質性情,共和國的德性仿佛隻剩下一張薄薄的紙。歸根到底馬基雅維利認為平民是又壞又蠢的,政治隻是一場趨嚮於敗壞的運動。在本科前三年給予我最大睏擾和啓發的不是柏拉圖亞裏士多德,也不是霍布斯盧梭,也不是馬基雅維利的《君主》,而是這本詭異的《論李維》。
评分為瞭mmw讀的,邏輯結構十分清楚
评分我到底能不能標注讀過?
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有