具体描述
How Great Firms Fail By Doing Everything Right
Harvard professor Clayton M. Christensen demonstrates in the most revolutionary business book in years why outstanding companies that did everything right-were in tune with the competition, listened to customers, and invested aggressively in new technologies still lost their market leadership when confronted with disruptive changes in technology and market structure ... and he tells how to avoid a similar fate as business races online into the twenty-first century. The Innovator's Dilemma eloquently demonstrates a shattering paradox: that the best of conventional good business practices can ultimately weaken a great firm. There is a certain type of technological innovation that Christensen labels disruptive technology, which mainstream customers initially reject. Following these customers causes well-managed firms to allow strategic innovations to languish. The solution? Create a subsidiary entirely focused on the emerging market, one that is free to be visionary while courting an unorthodox customer base and staying poised to catch the next great wave of industry growth. Sharp, cogent, and provocative, The Innovator's Dilemma is one of the most talked about business books of our time-and something that none of today's executives will dare to be without.
作者简介
克莱顿•克里斯坦森：哈佛商学院教授，因其在企业创新方面的深入研究和独到见解，被尊称为“创新大师”。1997年，当《创新者的窘境》英文版出版时，克莱顿•克里斯坦森只是哈佛商学院的助理教授。而此书一出，就确立了他在创新技术管理领域的权威地位
目录信息
读后感
读起来感觉跟读鸿沟和龙卷风一样过瘾,给高科技公司又提供了一个衡量成败的框架. 作者用磁盘/硬盘领域来分析也很棒,恐怕也很难找到更典型的剧烈变化的市场了. 核心理论是这样:三条斜线.纵轴是产品的性能,横轴是时间.第一条斜线:上一代产品的成长.第二条斜线:市场上的实际需求....
评分读起来感觉跟读鸿沟和龙卷风一样过瘾,给高科技公司又提供了一个衡量成败的框架. 作者用磁盘/硬盘领域来分析也很棒,恐怕也很难找到更典型的剧烈变化的市场了. 核心理论是这样:三条斜线.纵轴是产品的性能,横轴是时间.第一条斜线:上一代产品的成长.第二条斜线:市场上的实际需求....
评分 评分20年前IBM主导了大型计算机市场，却忽略了微型计算机的开发，以至于被微软乘虚而入。10年之后，微软也犯了同样的错误，主导了微型计算机市场,却忽略了智能手机的崛起。这些叱咤风云的企业也会错失市场先机，《创新者的窘境》一书正是要解决这一问题。 作者以硬盘市场为例来说明...
评分看了一下成书时间，1997年。现在是2018年的岁末，阅读此书时，对其想法的惊叹并没有随着这二十几年的岁月洗礼而褪色。尤其是最后一章用电动汽车作为案例，来举例如何判断破坏性创新、如何实施破坏性创新，这二十年的时间恰好是印证了其思考方法的高明。 成功者的悖论 不过震惊...
用户评价
Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
评分Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
评分Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
评分Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
评分Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
