How Great Firms Fail By Doing Everything Right
Harvard professor Clayton M. Christensen demonstrates in the most revolutionary business book in years why outstanding companies that did everything right-were in tune with the competition, listened to customers, and invested aggressively in new technologies still lost their market leadership when confronted with disruptive changes in technology and market structure ... and he tells how to avoid a similar fate as business races online into the twenty-first century. The Innovator's Dilemma eloquently demonstrates a shattering paradox: that the best of conventional good business practices can ultimately weaken a great firm. There is a certain type of technological innovation that Christensen labels disruptive technology, which mainstream customers initially reject. Following these customers causes well-managed firms to allow strategic innovations to languish. The solution? Create a subsidiary entirely focused on the emerging market, one that is free to be visionary while courting an unorthodox customer base and staying poised to catch the next great wave of industry growth. Sharp, cogent, and provocative, The Innovator's Dilemma is one of the most talked about business books of our time-and something that none of today's executives will dare to be without.
克莱顿•克里斯坦森:哈佛商学院教授,因其在企业创新方面的深入研究和独到见解,被尊称为“创新大师”。1997年,当《创新者的窘境》英文版出版时,克莱顿•克里斯坦森只是哈佛商学院的助理教授。而此书一出,就确立了他在创新技术管理领域的权威地位
越好的书我越爱存起来放到后面去看,就像一部很久以前听说的好电影,需要把爆米花片都扫完才能看一样。《创新者的窘境》就是这么一本书,一本非常经典的谈论创新思维的书。 《创新者的窘境》是乔布斯推荐(当然不是腰封式的推荐)的极少的书之一,它生动地描述了大企业、成熟...
评分 评分本书的逻辑: 一些大公司无法成功利用颠覆性的技术变革,不是因为他们无意识,技术能力不够,没有开发相关产品,没有适合的人才,没有投入资源; 而是因为: 1 目标依然锁定在现有市场,新技术仍用于满足现有用户需求和在现有市场中争抢份额,造成新生产品“没有市场”的错觉 -...
评分20年前IBM主导了大型计算机市场,却忽略了微型计算机的开发,以至于被微软乘虚而入。10年之后,微软也犯了同样的错误,主导了微型计算机市场,却忽略了智能手机的崛起。这些叱咤风云的企业也会错失市场先机,《创新者的窘境》一书正是要解决这一问题。 作者以硬盘市场为例来说明...
评分I have heard about this book for a long time. Bought it from Amazon and read through the whole book. Just like "Crossing the Chasm", it's a must read book for business and entrepreneur. This book gives an excellent explanation on Why it's Google, rather th...
Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
评分Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
评分Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
评分Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.
评分Great book and persuasive idea. It might help you to avoid companies such as Kodak and Nokia when they were doomed. But it is much more difficult to find out who will be the winner at the end.