What are the causes of war? To answer this question, Professor Waltz examines the ideas of major thinkers throughout the history of Western civilization. He explores works both by classic political philosophers, such as St. Augustine, Hobbes, Kant, and Rousseau, and by modern psychologists and anthropologists to discover ideas intended to explain war among states and related prescriptions for peace.
Kenneth N. Waltz is a recipient of the James Madison Award for distinguished scholarly contributions to political science from the American Political Science Association. He is Ford Professor Emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley, and is now at the Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University. He is the author of Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics, Theory of International Politics, and coauthor of The Spread of Nuclear Weapons.
问题:战争根源? 层次(意象):人,单个国家结构,国家体系。(p10) 一. 人性:自私,被误导的侵略冲动,愚蠢。(p14) 1.论述 奥古斯丁:原罪。(p18) 斯宾诺莎:情感压过理性。(p19) 尼布尔:傲慢。(p18) 摩根索:对权力的贪欲。(p20)现代政治思想分为两个流派:...
评分沃老的书原本皆为浅近英文,但译成中文就难免生涩。image一词继续被译作“意象”,但我总觉得这个词在英文中的意味其实与“印象”在中文中更相近,犯不着非用这么学究气的译法。但implications中译为“含义”则不能尽意,“蕴涵”或“意蕴”更好些。 当白则白,当文则文。与其...
评分 评分 评分问题:战争根源? 层次(意象):人,单个国家结构,国家体系。(p10) 一. 人性:自私,被误导的侵略冲动,愚蠢。(p14) 1.论述 奥古斯丁:原罪。(p18) 斯宾诺莎:情感压过理性。(p19) 尼布尔:傲慢。(p18) 摩根索:对权力的贪欲。(p20)现代政治思想分为两个流派:...
not compellingly convincing to the extend that I am a fan of constructivism....
评分现在还记得第一次读的时候那种惊为天人--structure太妙了/three images也是
评分HI280 这本书其实本质和Butterfield观念很像 一个是全部的过去创造了全部的现在,一个是战争的起因不能仅归于人、国家或国际结构中的一种,两者都强调你考虑的越全面就越正确。。书很有启迪尤其是它分析具体案例的时候 而且两个大学霸随手引用各界大牛的话真是让人分分钟跪下 但是结论真的就是废话。。(喜欢Human behavior那一章中关于self-preservation的部分)
评分when someone asked what caused the war, it is like the same question asking about what caused the sanfracisco 's earthquake.
评分Waltz先生讲道理讲得很清楚
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有