The author writes: The two long pieces in this book originally came out in The New Yorker ? RAISE HIGH THE ROOF BEAM, CARPENTERS in 1955, SEYMOUR ? An Introduction in 1959. Whatever their differences in mood or effect, they are both very much concerned with Seymour Glass, who is the main character in my still-uncompleted series about the Glass family. It struck me that they had better be collected together, if not deliberately paired off, in something of a hurry, if I mean them to avoid unduly or undesirably close contact with new material in the series. There is only my word for it, granted, but I have several new Glass stories coming along ? waxing, dilating ? each in its own way, but I suspect the less said about them, in mixed company, the better. Oddly, the joys and satisfactions of working on the Glass family peculiarly increase and deepen for me with the years. I can't say why, though. Not, at least, outside the casino proper of my fiction.
具体描述
读后感
Raise High the Roof Beam, Carpenters is still very much the Salinger I enjoyed reading. Even though I am probably not thoughtful enough to state the reason why. On the other hand, Seymour an Introduction is quite a bore, even worse than Franny and Zooey. ...
评分Raise High the Roof Beam, Carpenters is still very much the Salinger I enjoyed reading. Even though I am probably not thoughtful enough to state the reason why. On the other hand, Seymour an Introduction is quite a bore, even worse than Franny and Zooey. ...
评分Raise High the Roof Beam, Carpenters is still very much the Salinger I enjoyed reading. Even though I am probably not thoughtful enough to state the reason why. On the other hand, Seymour an Introduction is quite a bore, even worse than Franny and Zooey. ...
评分Raise High the Roof Beam, Carpenters is still very much the Salinger I enjoyed reading. Even though I am probably not thoughtful enough to state the reason why. On the other hand, Seymour an Introduction is quite a bore, even worse than Franny and Zooey. ...
评分Raise High the Roof Beam, Carpenters is still very much the Salinger I enjoyed reading. Even though I am probably not thoughtful enough to state the reason why. On the other hand, Seymour an Introduction is quite a bore, even worse than Franny and Zooey. ...
用户评价
好像读九故事的时候，看出来的对双雪涛的影响更大一点。
评分前面很喜欢，但后面其实我有点没太看懂...
评分"Just go to bed, now. Quickly. Quickly and slowly."
评分14岁的我整夜躺在床上，幻想自己有朝一日写出一篇《Seymour - An Introduction》式的小说。
评分塞林格是读者两极分化很严重的作家。我就不喜欢他。所有的主人公都是年轻人，怨天尤人，戚戚然不可终日的样子。西摩太聪明了，没有人理解他，他的天才弟妹们也不能达到跟他对话的高度，于是他自杀了。只有Zooey明白活着胜过一切伟大的死亡。Glass家族我只喜欢Zooey和Buddy.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有