Carlo Ginzburg is a noted historian and pioneer of microhistory. He is most famous for his ground-breaking book, The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth Century Miller, which examined the beliefs of an Italian heretic, Menocchio, from Montereale Valcellina.
此书出版于1976年,一直被认为是微观史的代表作。正如周兵所言,与勒华拉杜里的那本书应该是微观史的两种面向。此书更倾向于心态史,或者说精神史。微观史最危险的一点在于史料,因其依赖史料往往具有单一性。与同样使用审判材料的《档案中的虚构》比,本书应该不存在史料能否...
评分《奶酪与蠕虫》样章,个人翻译 英译版序言: 正如寻常会发生的那样,这项研究也是出自偶然。1962年,我在乌迪内度过了大半个夏天。在这座城市的大主教管区档案馆里,我埋首于卷帙浩繁的宗教裁判所文献之中,搜寻着有关一个古怪的弗留利教派的审判记录。这个教派的成员被法官裁...
评分《奶酪与蠕虫》样章,个人翻译 英译版序言: 正如寻常会发生的那样,这项研究也是出自偶然。1962年,我在乌迪内度过了大半个夏天。在这座城市的大主教管区档案馆里,我埋首于卷帙浩繁的宗教裁判所文献之中,搜寻着有关一个古怪的弗留利教派的审判记录。这个教派的成员被法官裁...
评分此书出版于1976年,一直被认为是微观史的代表作。正如周兵所言,与勒华拉杜里的那本书应该是微观史的两种面向。此书更倾向于心态史,或者说精神史。微观史最危险的一点在于史料,因其依赖史料往往具有单一性。与同样使用审判材料的《档案中的虚构》比,本书应该不存在史料能否...
评分Fascinating subject matter, yet Ginzburg's effort to reclaim an oral tradition of peasant "popular culture" does seem inadequately substantiated. The methodological discussions in the preface are quite informative though.
评分这书让我想起了阿Q正传。
评分Fascinating subject matter, yet Ginzburg's effort to reclaim an oral tradition of peasant "popular culture" does seem inadequately substantiated. The methodological discussions in the preface are quite informative though.
评分Fascinating subject matter, yet Ginzburg's effort to reclaim an oral tradition of peasant "popular culture" does seem inadequately substantiated. The methodological discussions in the preface are quite informative though.
评分Fascinating subject matter, yet Ginzburg's effort to reclaim an oral tradition of peasant "popular culture" does seem inadequately substantiated. The methodological discussions in the preface are quite informative though.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有