With a third of the global urban population already living in Dickensian slums, at least half under the age of twenty, Mike Davis explores the threat of disease, of forced settlement on hazardous terrains, and of state violence on huge populations. He shows also how poverty not only grew massively in the 1990s but how the gap between rich and poor countries expanded and how women and minorities fell further behind. Surveying the new urban poor from Bombay to Cairo, Cape Town to Rio de Janeiro, Mike Davis argues that this enormous population of marginalised labourers is not an industrious beehive of ambitious entrepreneurs but a stagnant ferment of extreme Darwinian competition which threatens to overflow the shanty-towns, and swamp the homes and businesses of the urban rich.
这不得不说是一本城市的辛酸史,不得不说是人民大众的血泪史,在感慨万千后,我要说的是:用黑色的眼镜看世界,世界将永远没有光明。 或许这句话本身有点唯心论,但是不得不承认的是,我无法说服自己接受书中的事实,即使知道这是事实或趋势或预言或警示,但我依然愿意往自己...
評分19世纪末号称“光明之城”的巴黎是人们心目中现代城市的模式。城市将变成贫民窟,terrible。2006年,人类有史以来第一次城市人口多与农村人口。超级城市,2000万以上的人口。雅加达、达卡、卡拉奇、上海。全球贫富差距越来越大,2020年城市居民中45-50%是贫困人口,2030年全球...
評分首先,很惭愧地说,居然九个月没写过书评了。真是无颜见江东父老。这期间也确实好像没读过书,无话可说。工作忙,生活忙,也不知道忙了些什么。很大的一个问题就是花了太多时间在各种屏幕前头,时间都被消耗。就连这本200页的书也拖拖拉拉搞了两个多月才看完。 此书在好两次会...
評分首先,很惭愧地说,居然九个月没写过书评了。真是无颜见江东父老。这期间也确实好像没读过书,无话可说。工作忙,生活忙,也不知道忙了些什么。很大的一个问题就是花了太多时间在各种屏幕前头,时间都被消耗。就连这本200页的书也拖拖拉拉搞了两个多月才看完。 此书在好两次会...
評分19世纪末号称“光明之城”的巴黎是人们心目中现代城市的模式。城市将变成贫民窟,terrible。2006年,人类有史以来第一次城市人口多与农村人口。超级城市,2000万以上的人口。雅加达、达卡、卡拉奇、上海。全球贫富差距越来越大,2020年城市居民中45-50%是贫困人口,2030年全球...
Mike Davis is a typical urban-apocalyptic activist and he made a lot of criticism on the place (LA, California, where he is a native). An anti-wealthiness/power socialist, criticized the reformist as most of the reforms are tackling the superficial symptoms rather than the root: inequality. The arguments are too overwhelming for me.
评分基本上列數字,不停quote彆人,but a helpful overview
评分Mike Davis is a typical urban-apocalyptic activist and he made a lot of criticism on the place (LA, California, where he is a native). An anti-wealthiness/power socialist, criticized the reformist as most of the reforms are tackling the superficial symptoms rather than the root: inequality. The arguments are too overwhelming for me.
评分基本上列數字,不停quote彆人,but a helpful overview
评分依然是Mike Davis 一貫的立場,隻是少瞭些第一手研究,有點雜湊的嫌疑,不過還是好書。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有