Amateur hour has arrived, and the audience is running the show
In a hard-hitting and provocative polemic, Silicon Valley insider and pundit Andrew Keen exposes the grave consequences of today’s new participatory Web 2.0 and reveals how it threatens our values, economy, and ultimately the very innovation and creativity that forms the fabric of American achievement.
Our most valued cultural institutions, Keen warns—our professional newspapers, magazines, music, and movies—are being overtaken by an avalanche of amateur, user-generated free content. Advertising revenue is being siphoned off by free classified ads on sites like Craigslist; television networks are under attack from free user-generated programming on YouTube and the like; file-sharing and digital piracy have devastated the multibillion-dollar music business and threaten to undermine our movie industry. Worse, Keen claims, our “cut-and-paste” online culture—in which intellectual property is freely swapped, downloaded, remashed, and aggregated—threatens over 200 years of copyright protection and intellectual property rights, robbing artists, authors, journalists, musicians, editors, and producers of the fruits of their creative labors.
In today’s self-broadcasting culture, where amateurism is celebrated and anyone with an opinion, however ill-informed, can publish a blog, post a video on YouTube, or change an entry on Wikipedia, the distinction between trained expert and uninformed amateur becomes dangerously blurred. When anonymous bloggers and videographers, unconstrained by professional standards or editorial filters, can alter the public debate and manipulate public opinion, truth becomes a commodity to be bought, sold, packaged, and reinvented.
The very anonymity that the Web 2.0 offers calls into question the reliability of the information we receive and creates an environment in which sexual predators and identity thieves can roam free. While no Luddite—Keen pioneered several Internet startups himself—he urges us to consider the consequences of blindly supporting a culture that endorses plagiarism and piracy and that fundamentally weakens traditional media and creative institutions.
Offering concrete solutions on how we can reign in the free-wheeling, narcissistic atmosphere that pervades the Web, THE CULT OF THE AMATEUR is a wake-up call to each and every one of us.</p>
安德鲁·基恩,美国著名媒体人,频繁出现在各大媒体节目中,如,福克斯新闻、CNN国际、BBC晚间新闻等。他还为《伦敦独立报》写一个关于企业重组的专栏,同时也在为Dutch paper Volkskrant 和the Belgium daily De Standaard 两个纸媒撰写专栏。
这本书没啥意思。作者是一个极端的精英主义者,虽然在结论中提出应当避免技术所带来的负面影响,还是有点警示作用,但是其立论的根据却是相当薄弱,用非常守旧的思想去看待新生的事物,盗版、欺诈、隐私这些问题不是web2.0造成的,没有互联网,这些问题依然存在,而作者却把这...
评分精英主义,和反精英主义的反动 ——基恩何时走上TED大会的讲台? 基恩认为,业余人士终究是业余人士;精英总归是精英。 与基恩观点针锋相对的另一位网络研究者Clay Shirky认为,哪怕是最愚蠢的创作行为,也终归是艺术。[GSS:参见其TED报告,How cognitive surplus will cha...
评分《门外汉的崇拜:今日的互联网如何扼杀我们的文化和危害我们的经济》(The Cult of the Amateur:How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy) 安德鲁·基恩自称是一名dot-com的变节者,虽然他现在时常批评web2.0,基恩却曾经是上世纪九十年代...
评分我推荐喜欢关注互联网未来的朋友看看这本书。 我倒不是作者安德鲁的知音,但我也不像他那样对另一个安德森(长尾理论的提出者)那样深恶痛绝,至于安德鲁批评网络游戏和色情成瘾的章节,总让我忍不住想起陶宏开教授,哈哈,美国人也不缺陶宏开式的人啊。 不过安德鲁不是陶宏...
评分我们经常听到官方说,国情不同。这四个字仿佛一把万能钥匙,当固有的理论豪宅走到山穷水尽之时,大管家出来手持这把钥匙一转,就领你进到一个新房间——不管灯光有多昏暗,先进去再说。笃信普世价值的人群往往对这四个字嗤之以鼻,将其归结为监守自盗的说辞,但至少对于基恩的...
some chapters are fun to read, some are wasting of ink
评分Reek of elitism. Simple-minded, empty arguments; confused logic; twisted facts.
评分作者发现了很多引人思考的问题,但却总是站在过去的立场看问题,很令人遗憾。
评分motherfuxker~這廝的精英意識讓人受不了;我個人很期待web 2.0時代的無政府狀態^^
评分简直要负分...标题/概念太吸引了,结果里面的论证完全...excuse me!?corelation和causation的逻辑呢!
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有